Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gena Ram Kachhawaha vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 7591 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7591 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Gena Ram Kachhawaha vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 2 September, 2024

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2024:RJ-JD:36164-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                   D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 846/2024

Gena Ram Kachhawaha S/o Shri Khaingar Ram, Aged About 40
Years, R/o- Plot No. 8, Khasra No. 1734, Hanslava Ki Pal,
Nagauri Bera, Nayapura, Mandore, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
                                                                        ----Appellant
                                       Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through, Secretary, Dept. Of
         Sports And Youth, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       The   Registrar,        Cooperative         Societies,     Jaipur,   Shakar
         Bhawan, 22 Godown, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.       The District Collector Cum Ex Officio Chairman, District
         Sports Council, Jodhpur.
4.       The District Sports Officer, Jodhpur Sports Council, Umaid
         Stadium Jodhpur.
5.       The   Deputy        Registrar        (Societies        Reg),   Cooperative
         Department, Jodhpur.
6.       The Rajasthan State Softball Association, Through Its
         Secretary, E-47, Anand Puri, Behing Moti Doongri Police
         Station, Jaipur
7.       The Jodhpur District Softball, Association, Through Its
         Secretary, 19/883, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur.
8.       Shri Rohitash Sharma, R/o - 19/883, Chopasani Housing
         Board, Jodhpur.
9.       Shri Om Singh Rajpurohit, R/o - 2/6, Chopasani Housing
         Board, Jodhpur.
10.      Shri Narpat Singh Gehlot, R/o A-1, Subhash Extension
         K.v. No. 1 Road, Air Force Area, Jodhpur.
11.      Shri Neeraj Kaushik, R/o - D-21, Shankar Nagar, Pal
         Road, Jodhpur.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)             :     Mr. Prtihvi Raj Singh Jodha
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. himmat Singh Bhati



      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

[2024:RJ-JD:36164-DB] (2 of 3) [SAW-846/2024]

Order

02/09/2024

The writ petition was filed with the following prayers:-

"It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the instant stay petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate order or direction the effect and operation of the judgment and order dated 05.08.2024 passed by the learned single judge may kindly be stayed.

Further the Deputy Registrar (Society Registration) (respondent no.5) may be directed to hold detailed inquiry in view of Annexure-4 appended with the writ petition and election of Jodhpur District Softball Association and take appropriate action as per the law against the responsible office bearers of the District Softball Association Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit just and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner trust."

2. Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh Jodha, the learned counsel for the

appellant refers to the objections raised by the Gena Ram

Kachhawaha given to the Deputy Registrar (Institution

Registration) which were not inquired into and the elections were

held whereunder eight persons of the same family have been

declared elected. As we gather on a glance at the writ Court's

order, a number of grounds were raised by the appellant before

the writ Court. However, the writ petition was dismissed on the

ground that there is adequate mechanism under section 16 of the

Rajasthan Sport (Registration, Recognition & Regulation of

Association) Act 2005 (hereinafter referred to the Act of 2005) for

redressing the grievance raised by the writ petitioner.

3. As we have seen, elections were conducted and members

have already been elected and, therefore, merely on the ground of

objections raised by a member vide annexure-4 the elections so

held cannot be declared invalid. Therefore, while according our

concurrence to the order dated 05th August 2024 passed in S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.11875/2024, we observe that the appellant

[2024:RJ-JD:36164-DB] (3 of 3) [SAW-846/2024]

may raise any ground as available to him in law including the

objections raised by him vide annexure-4, while challenging the

elections.

4. If an application under section 16 of the Act of 2005 is filed,

we expect that the same is decided expeditiously keeping in mind

the tenure of the elected members.

5. Accordingly, the D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 846/2024 is

disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J (SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR),J 13-mohit/divya-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter