Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishnu Dutt @ Bishna Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:36301)
2024 Latest Caselaw 7573 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7573 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Vishnu Dutt @ Bishna Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:36301) on 2 September, 2024

Author: Birendra Kumar

Bench: Birendra Kumar

[2024:RJ-JD:36301]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                  No. 861/2024

                                           IN

                     S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1044/2024

1.       Vishnu Dutt @ Bishna Ram S/o Ramu Ram, Aged About
         38 Years, R/o Ban, Police Station Sri Dungargarh, Dist.
         Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner)
2.       Smt. Chanda Devi @ Rami Devi W/o Ramu Ram, Aged
         About 80 Years, R/o Ban, Police Station Sri Dungargarh,
         Dist. Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner)
                                                                    ----Applicants
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Applicants (s)           :     Mr. Deepak Menaria.
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP.
                                   Mr. Sahi Ram Godara.



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

Order

02/09/2024

1. Heard the parties on prayer for suspension of sentence.

2. Appellant No.1 is husband of the victim of dowry death.

Appellant No.2 is mother-in-law, aged about 80 years. By the

impugned judgment, conviction has been recorded for offences

under Sections 498-A and 304- B IPC.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits, the fact is that

three full sisters were married in the same family. One of the

sisters is the victim of this case. The parties have now amicably

[2024:RJ-JD:36301] (2 of 3) [SOSA-861/2024]

settled their dispute to protect the life of other full sisters so the

prayer for suspension of sentence be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the

complainant opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence.

5. Perused the evidence on record. Considering the offences

proved and punishment awarded, which is rigorous imprisonment

of 7 years, this Court is not inclined to suspend the sentence of

applicant No.1 Vishnu Dutt @ Bishna Ram. Hence, prayer for

Suspension of Sentence qua applicant No.1 is refused.

6. Appellant No.2 is a female aged about 80 years and is

carrying general and omnibus allegation, hence, her prayer for

suspension of sentence is allowed. The sentence awarded against

applicant No.2 Smt. Chanda Devi @ Rami Devi by the Learned

Additional Sessions Judge, Sridungargarh, District Bikaner vide

judgment dated 06.07.2024 passed in Sessions Case No. 10/2009

shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal provided

that she furnishes a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of

like amount (one of the sureties of territorial jurisdiction of trial

court) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with following

conditions:-

(1) That she will appear in person before the trial court in the first week of July of every year till the appeal is decided.

(2) That if the applicant changes the place of residence, she will give in writing her changed address to the trial court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

(3) Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address(s) to the trial court.

[2024:RJ-JD:36301] (3 of 3) [SOSA-861/2024]

7. Hence, application for suspension of sentence stands partly

allowed and partly refused.

8. The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused-applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

9. Appearance of the parties is complete.

10. Lower court record is already there.

11. Let the appeal itself be listed on 10.10.2024 for final hearing.

(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 112-sumer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter