Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Usha Kinra vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:36345)
2024 Latest Caselaw 7571 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7571 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Usha Kinra vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:36345) on 2 September, 2024

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2024:RJ-JD:36345]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14427/2024

Usha Kinra W/o Shri Subhash Kinra, Aged About 67 Years,
Resident Of Vill. 30 B.b. Tehsil Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar
Retired On 30.06.2017 From The Post Of Senior Teacher Ii Gr.
Govt. Sr. School, 43 Rb, Tehsil - Padampur District Sri
Ganganagar. (Ppo No. 10625599 (R))
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department
         Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
         Rajasthan.
2.       The Principal Secretary, Finance, Department Of
         Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Secretariat, Jaipur,
         Rajasthan.
3.       The   Director,  Pension    And                  Pensioners     Welfare
         Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.       The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5.       The Depuy Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare
         Department, Regional Office Bikaner.
6.       The District Education Officer Headquarters (Secondary /
         Elementary Education), Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).
7.       The Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And
         Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat
         Jaipur, Rajasthan.
8.       The Joint Director, Pension And Pensioners                      Welfare
         Department, Regional Office Bikaner.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. H.R. Chawla
For Respondent(s)         :     -


                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

02/09/2024

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has superannuated on 30th June and the controversy

involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment dated 21.07.2023 of this Court at Jaipur Bench

rendered in a batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ

[2024:RJ-JD:36345] (2 of 3) [CW-14427/2024]

Petition No.21/2020 (Vijay Singh vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors.). The operative part of the said order is

reproduced as under:-

"41.Hence, looking to the binding effect of above judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of C.P.Mundinamani(supra) and All India Judges Association(supra), it is held that the petitioners would be entitled to get the benefits of increment falling due on 1st July on account of their conduct for the requisite length of time i.e. one year. The petitioners would be entitled to get notional payment on 1st July, notwithstanding their superannuation on 30th June.

42. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners afresh in the light of the observations made hereinabove and thereafter grant notional increment to the petitioners. The petitioners' pension would consequently be refixed. The appropriate orders be issued and the arrears of pension be paid to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

43. With the aforesaid directions, all these petitions stand disposed of.

44. Stay applications and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of"

2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be

permitted to file a detailed representation before the

competent authorities for redressal of his grievances.

[2024:RJ-JD:36345] (3 of 3) [CW-14427/2024]

3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed

with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to the

competent authorities of the department and the competent

authorities of the department are directed to decide the

same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt

of such representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls

within the purview of the law laid down by this Court in the

case of Vijay Singh (supra); the same shall be decided in

terms of the judgment above.

4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine

the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only

in case the averments made therein are found to be correct,

the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought.

5. Stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.

(FARJAND ALI),J 291-chhavi/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter