Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nenu Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:36335)
2024 Latest Caselaw 7558 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7558 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Nenu Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:36335) on 2 September, 2024

[2024:RJ-JD:36335]

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5866/2024

Nenu Choudhary D/o Shri Tejaram Choudhary, Aged About 33
Years, Village Neepal, Desuri, Distt. Pali, Raj.
                                                                         ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Raj.
3.       Inspector General Of Police, Pali Range, Pali, Raj.
4.       Superintendent Of Police, Pali, Raj.
5.       The Sho, P.s. Desuri Distt. Pali, Raj.
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr. Himanshu Pareek
For Respondent(s)              :    Mr. Ram Choudhary, P.P.



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order

02/09/2024

1. Dissatisfied with the progress and manner of the

investigation, the petitioner (complainant) seeks issuance of

directions to the respondents to conduct a fair

inquiry/investigation regarding FIR No.118/2024 dated

02.08.2024, registered under Sections 115(2), 127(2), 134,

303(2) and 333 of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Desuri, District Pali.

2. Heard.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the

investigating agency is not proceeding in a fair and just manner

and is intentionally stalling the investigation after registration of

FIR.

[2024:RJ-JD:36335] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5866/2024]

4. Learned Public Prosecutor appears on service of advance

copy of the petition and accepts notice on behalf of the State. He

opposes the petition arguing that once FIR was registered, law will

take its own course.

5. Be that as it may, in my opinion, the petitioner ought to have

availed of other available legal remedies for redressal of his

grievance before approaching this Court. Ordinarily, in cases of

grievances arising from unfair or improper investigation of an FIR,

the aggrieved person can seek recourse by approaching a superior

police officer as per Section 30 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Sanhita, 2023. If the grievance remains unaddressed, one can

then approach a Magistrate of competent jurisdiction under

Section 175(3) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, who

can seek submission of a report by the police. Reference may also

be had to Apex Court judgment in Sakiri Vasu versus State of

U.P. and Others1.

6. In the premise, instant petition is disposed of with liberty to

approach the appropriate forum for redressal of grievance, as

aforesaid.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(ARUN MONGA),J 113-AnilKC/-

                                   Whether Fit for Reporting -      Yes / No




                                   1    2008 (2) SCC 409






Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter