Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5885 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:40249-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 281/2024
In
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.493/2024
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10293/2024
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through The
Chairman And Managing Director, Having The Registered Office
At Vidyut Bhawan, Jan Path, Lalkothi, Jaipur-302005, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Somi Conveyors Beltings Limited, Having Registered
Office At 4F-15, Oliver House, New Powerhouse Road,
Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
2. Nrc Industries Private Limited, Having Its Registered
Office At 9Th Milestone, Kashmir Road, Verka, Amritsar-
143501
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartik Seth with Mrs. Shriya Gilhotra, Mr. Darsh Pareek, Ms. Maithili Moondra & Mr. Raghav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sumeer Sodhi & Mr. Punit Singhvi through VC assisted by Mr. Ayush Singh
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
21/09/2024
1. Heard.
2. There is a defect of cause-title, the same is overruled.
3. Though notices have not been issued, Mr. Sumeer Sodhi and
Mr. Punit Singhvi enter appearance through video conferencing for
respondent No.2-NRC Industries Private Limited.
[2024:RJ-JP:40249-DB] (2 of 3) [WMAP-281/2024]
4. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant would submit
that even though this Court had made a request to learned Single
Bench to consider the application for vacating ex parte interim
order, vide order dated 06.08.2024, the application, despite
repeated request, has not been taken up for consideration and
because of ex parte stay of a tender process for procurement of
conveyor belts by the Corporation, there may be crisis for
maintaining the generation and supply of the electricity.
5. We find that the interim order was passed during summer
vacation by the learned Vacation Judge on 25.06.2024. Thereafter,
an application for vacating stay order was filed on 10.07.2024.
Thereafter, when the case was listed for consideration on the
application, it could not reach, though prayer was made but even
then, the application was not taken up. In those circumstances,
the appeal was filed.
6. On 06.08.2024, we requested the learned Single Judge to
hear the application for vacating stay order at the earliest,
preferably within a period of one week. However, it is submitted
that thereafter again request was made, but the case has not
been taken up and the application for vacating stay remains
undecided.
7. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant also draws
attention of this Court to the provisions contained under Article
226 (3) of the Constitution of India as also the judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramrameshwari Devi Vs.
Nirmala Devi, reported in (2011) 8 SCC 249.
8. Upon consideration of the submissions made by learned
counsel for the applicant-appellant and that prayer is made for
[2024:RJ-JP:40249-DB] (3 of 3) [WMAP-281/2024]
restoration of appeal, we are inclined to restore D.B. Civil Special
Appeal (Writ) No.493/2024 to its original number for consideration
on its own merit.
9. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
10. The appeal be listed for consideration in the next week.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
RAJAT/ARTI/1
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!