Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9194 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:42946]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16466/2024
1. Teekaram Meena S/o Shri Ramkesh Meena, Aged About
24 Years, R/o Village Khanpur, Post Chauragaon, Dist.
Karauli Currently Posted At Office Of The Aen, Phed Sub-
Division Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur.
2. Hemraj Meena S/o Shri Meghraj Meena, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Near Hanuman Ji Ka Mandir, Karauli Currently
Posted At Office Of The Aen, Phed Sub- Division Gangapur
City.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Public Health
And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. The Chief Engineer (Administration), Public Health And
Engineering Department, Jal Bhawan. Civil Lines, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanka Bhootra
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Purushottam Joshi for
Mr. P. S. Chundawat, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
21/10/2024
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the
issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by
judgment of this Court in Vimla Devi Saini v. State of Rajasthan &
Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7330/2016, decided on
20.11.2017 by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Bench at Jaipur),
wherein, the writ petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of in
terms of order in the case of Charu Joshi v. State of Rajasthan &
Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.419/2015, decided on 22.1.2016.
[2024:RJ-JD:42946] (2 of 2) [CW-16466/2024]
Against the judgment in the case of Vimla Devi Saini
(supra),appeal filed by the State being D.B. Civil Special Appeal
(Writ) No.877/2019 has also been dismissed by the Division Bench
on 30.9.2019.
Further, in the case of Mahendra v. State of Rajasthan &
Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4689/2020, decided on 11.6.2020,
following the order in the case of Vimla Devi Saini (supra), relief
has been granted to the petitioner therein.
In the case of Vimla Devi Saini (supra), it was inter alia
directed by this Court as under:-
"10. In view of the above, the above noted writ petition is allowed with the direction to the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer in the quota of direct recruitment of Junior Engineer (Degree Holder) by way of transfer in case there is a vacancy and to compute his seniority according to the Rules."
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not
dispute that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
squarely covered by judgment in the case of Vimla Devi
Saini(supra).
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by
the petitioners is allowed in light of and with similar directions as
given in the case of Vimla Devi Saini (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 30-SunilS/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!