Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yakoob Son Of Shri Nazir Khan vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:45157)
2024 Latest Caselaw 6292 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6292 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Yakoob Son Of Shri Nazir Khan vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:45157) on 25 October, 2024

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2024:RJ-JP:45157]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7163/2024

1.       Yakoob Son Of Shri Nazir Khan, Aged About 39 Years,
         Resident Of Raheem Nagar, Kho Nagoriyan, Jaipur.
2.       Anees Son Of Shri Nasru Khan, Aged About 53 Years,
         Resident Of Dhandhi Bandha Wali, Kho Nagoriyan, Jaipur.
3.       Rais Son Of Shri Fakeer Khan, Aged About 42 Years,
         Resident Of Dhandhi Ladhawat, Raheem Nagar, Kho
         Nagoriyan, Jaipur
4.       Zaheed, Son Of Shri Razak Khan, Aged About 3 Years,
         Resident Of Dhandhi Bisayati Wali, Kho Nagoriyan, Jaipur.
5.       Shabbir @ Munna, Son Of Shri Shakoor Khan, Aged About
         59 Years, Resident Of Dhandhi Dhodhadiya Wali, Kho
         Nagoriyan, Jaipur.
6.       Fayyaz, Son Of Shri Allahnoor Khan, Aged About 63
         Years, Resident Of Dhandhi Bandha Wali, Kho Nagoriyan,
         Jaipur.
7.       Muneer Son Of Shri Allahnoor Khan, Aged About 42
         Years, Resident Of Dhandhi Bandha Wali, Kho Nagoriyan,
         Jaipur.
8.       Rais Son Of Shri Allahnoor Khan, Aged About 48 Years,
         Resident Of Dhandhi Bandha Wali, Kho Nagoriyan, Jaipur
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

2. Mohammed Salim, Son Of Shri Chuttan Khan, Resident Of Dhandhi Dhodhadiya Wali, Gram Kho Nagoriyan, Jaipur

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Adil For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Junaid Khan for Complainant

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

25/10/2024

[2024:RJ-JP:45157] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7163/2024]

1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a

prayer to quash the FIR No. 211/2012 registered at Police Station

Malviya Nagar, Jaipur East, for offences under Sections 147, 336

and 504 of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated between

the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that

present FIR is lodged in a fit of rage, wherein Final Report is filed.

It is further submitted that the learned Trial Court has taken

cognizance of the matter and has commenced the proceedings

qua the same.

3. Further, it is submitted that the dispute is inter-se between

the parties, who belong to the same community. The issue arose

due to some political rivalry and due to election contested for the

post of President. Moreover, the parties want to put a quietus to

the instant dispute, and in light of the same, they have entered

into a compromise, which was executed and furnished before the

learned Trial Court on 01.11.2023.

4. Lastly, it is submitted that the learned Trial Court has allowed

the said compromise, however qua the Sections 504, 147 and 326

of IPC, offenses are non compoundable, therefore the parties have

approached this Court.

5. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the

dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been

resolved by the parties amicably.

6. Heard and considered.

7. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place

reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in

[2024:RJ-JP:45157] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7163/2024]

Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in [(2012) 10 SCC

303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is

reproduced as below:

"12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable."

6. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex

Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature

of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this

Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.

Compromise is taken on record.

7. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal

miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 211/2012

registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, Jaipur East, with all

consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside.

8. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending

application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /22

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter