Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukesh Chand Saini S/O Dulhe Ram vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 2357 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2357 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Mukesh Chand Saini S/O Dulhe Ram vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 28 March, 2024

Author: Ganesh Ram Meena

Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena

[2024:RJ-JP:15073]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4058/2024

1.       Mukesh Chand Saini S/o Dulhe Ram, Aged About 42
         Years, R/o Vpo Sonkh, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Balveer Singh Varma S/o Daulat Ram, Aged About 45
         Years, R/o Vpo Butiyana, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District
         Alwar, Rajasthan.
3.       Neeraj Kumar Bhardwaj S/o Shakti Dhar Bhardwaj, Aged
         About 41 Years, R/o Vpo Rambas, Tehsil Govindgarh,
         District Alwar, Rajasthan.
4.       Ashish Yadav S/o Pooran Singh Yadav, Aged About 38
         Years, R/o New Plot, Rajaji Ka Bas, Alwar, Rajasthan
5.       Vipin Sharma S/o Satya Naraian Sharma, Aged About 39
         Years, R/o 15 Daya Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan.
6.       Ashok S/o Budhram Jatav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
         Village     Ronpur,      Tehsil      Laxmangarh,          District   Alwar,
         Rajasthan.
7.       Subhash Chand Jatav S/o Sukhpal Jatav, Aged About 38
         Years, R/o Village Ronpur, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District
         Alwar, Rajasthan.
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                      Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical,
         Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution,
         Jhalana, Institutional Area, Jaipur (Raj.)
3.       The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services
         Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme,
         Jaipur
                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)           :     Mr. Ram Pratap Sani
                                  Mr. Aamir Khan
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA


                       (Downloaded on 12/04/2024 at 09:16:04 PM)
 [2024:RJ-JP:15073]                   (2 of 3)                    [CW-4058/2024]


                          Judgment / Order

28/03/2024

1.    Learned counsels for the parties jointly submit that the

controversy involved in the instant petition is squarely covered by

the order passed this Court in the case of Rajendra Kumar

Beniwal Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.14080/2023) decided on 16.11.2023 along with

other connected matters.

2.    In light of such submissions, the present petition is disposed

of in light of the Rajendra Kumar Beniwal (supra) with the

following directions:-
                  "A. All the representations shall be
           properly organized by the State to have a
           proper and elaborate consideration of the
           same.
                  B.    In case any of the petitioner has
           failed to file the representation, it shall be
           open for the petitioner who has filed the writ
           petition      upto     16.11.2023,     by     the
           advertisement for the recruitment of Nursing
           and Paramedical Officers etc. may file such
           representation within a period of 20 days
           from today along with certified /web copy of
           this order.
                  C.    Such representations shall be
           considered by the State while keeping into
           consideration the policy decision taken by the
           State on 03.11.2023 and the deliberations
           regarding the issues in question.
                  D.    The State shall be required to take
           a considered stand on each of the broader
           controversy before publishing the final select
           list, after considering the grievance raised in
           such representations.
                  E.    It shall be open for the petitioners

to approach this Court again after the State has applied its mind on the representations and passed appropriate speaking orders strictly in accordance with law.

F. The State shall strictly adhere to the Rule 19 of the Rules of1965 while deciding all these representations.

G. The decision taken by the State shall be uploaded on the website. H. In case

[2024:RJ-JP:15073] (3 of 3) [CW-4058/2024]

any issue beyond the policy decision dated 03.11.2023 also remains, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file representations within a period of 20 days from today alongwith certified/web copy of this order, which shall also be considered appropriately by the respondent-State.

I. In case the matters come back to this Court, it shall be open for the both parties to raise all their issues as this Court has not entered into the merits of the controversy while passing today's order."

3. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of

accordingly.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

ARTI SHARMA /116

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter