Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2195 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:14261]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 289/2024
1. Mohammad Sultan S/o Mohammad Vajib,
Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Naru Ki
Bavdi, Kagji Devra, Police Station Kotwali,
District Bundi. (At Present Confined In District
Jail Bundi, District Bundi)
2. Mohammad Arbaj S/o Mohammad Vajib, Aged
About 19 Years, Resident Of Naru Ki Bavdi,
Kagji Devra, Police Station Kotwali, District
Bundi. (At Present Confined In District Jail
Bundi, District Bundi)
3. Mohammad Shahid @ Bittu S/o Mohammad
Vajid, Resident Of Naru Ki Bavdi, Kagji Devra,
Police Station Kotwali, District Bundi. (At
Present Confined In District Jail Bundi, District
Bundi) ----Appellants
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Mahendra Kumar S/o Gajanand Khatik, R/o Pani Ki Tanki Ke Niche, Kagji Devra, Bundi, Kotwali Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain, Adv., and Mr. Akram Khan, Adv., for Mr. Eliyas Ali, Adv.
For : Mr. Riyasat Ali, P.P. Respondent(s) Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 21/03/2024
The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A
of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short "the
[2024:RJ-JP:14261] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-289/2024]
Act of 1989") has been filed in connection with FIR
No.417/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali,
District Bundi for the offence under Section(s) 341,
323, 324, 325, 307/34 of IPC and under Section(s)
3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(V), 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.
It is contended by learned counsel for the
appellants that the appellants are innocent and have
falsely been implicated in this case. He further
submits that it is the case of version and cross-
version and the charge-sheet has already been filed.
He also submits that the accused-appellants have
been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion
of the trial will take long time, hence prays for their
release on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the
appeal.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and
circumstances of the case, but without expressing
any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case,
this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the
appellants on bail.
The order dated 31.01.2024 passed by the
learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of
Atrocities Cases), Bundi (Rajasthan) is quashed and
set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed. It is
[2024:RJ-JP:14261] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-289/2024]
directed that accused-appellants namely (1)
Mohammad Sultan S/o Mohammad Vajib, (2)
Mohammad Arbaj S/o Mohammad Vajib and (3)
Mohammad Shahid @ Bittu S/o Mohammad
Vajid shall be released on bail provided each of them
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with
two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty
Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall
appear before that Court and any Court to which the
matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of
hearing and as and when called upon to do so and
shall comply with all the conditions laid down under
Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
YOGESH KUMAR /31
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!