Rajasthan High Court
Sushila Sharma W/O Virendra Kumar ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:2822) on 17 January, 2024
Author: Ganesh Ram Meena
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2024:RJ-JP:2822]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15160/2023
Sushila Sharma W/o Virendra Kumar Sharma, Aged About 60
Years, R/o Village Ami, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Govt. Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj).
3. Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare,
Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj).
4. Director, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner,
Rajasthan.
5. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jaipur.
6. Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Putli, Tehsil
Kotputli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Kumar Khandal
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
17/01/2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by
the judgment of Division Bench in the case of Ramesh Chander
Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. C Writ
Petition No. 2800/2021) and other connected matters,
decided on 17.10.2023.
(Downloaded on 28/01/2024 at 07:50:11 PM)
[2024:RJ-JP:2822] (2 of 3) [CW-15160/2023]
2. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing a
representation for redressal of her grievances in the light of
judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander
Gupta (supra).
3. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division
Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in
Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. C Writ
Petition No. 5445/2022, dediced on 07.08.2023 & the
Comm Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs.
Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. C Writ Petition No.
4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon'ble Sup Court in
the case of Di (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P.
Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the
following directions:-
"It is also brought to the notice of this Court
that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023
and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023
have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A
copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and
19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court
have also been placed on record. Therefore, the
present petitions are also disposed off on the
same terms with direction to the respondents to
consider the claim of the petitioners and pass
appropriate orders and other consequential
benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever
amount is found payable be also released within
a period of one month. Accordingly, the present
petitions are disposed of."
4. Ordered accordingly.
5. In the event of filing a representation by the petitioner, the
respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioner and pass an
[2024:RJ-JP:2822] (3 of 3) [CW-15160/2023]
appropriate order in accordance with law and the observations
made in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra). The writ
petition stands disposed of.
6. The order has been passed on the submissions made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the
writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition in the light of
the observations made by the Division Bench of this court in the
case of Ramesh Chander Gupta, and only in case the averments
made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner be extended
the relief as prayed with consequential benefits as ordered in the
case of Ramesh Chander Gupta.
7. Since the main petition has been disposed of, stay
application and all pending application/s, if any, to dispose.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /271
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
