Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 192 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:3157]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1413/2023
Bhagirath Barala S/o Rameshwar Barala, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Radha Swami Bagh, Near Barala Hospital, Behind Pandit
Hotel, Chomu, District-Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor
2. Manoj Agarwal S/o Vipin Prakash Agarwal, R/o 89, Krishna Colony, Near Parking Hospital, Dher Ke Balaji, Teen Dukaan, Sikar Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Gunjan Pathak Ms. Ishita Rawat Mr. Aditya Bohra Mr. Kanish Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhadia - PP Mr. Virendra Pratap Singh for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
11/01/2024
1. This criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with
Section 401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the judgment
dated 05.08.2023 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions
Judge No.8, Jaipur Metropolitan-II in Criminal Appeal No.31/2023
(CIS No.146/2023), whereby, the learned appellate court has
upheld the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
16.02.2023 passed by the learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate
(N.I. Act Cases) No.10, Jaipur Metroplitan-II in Criminal Case
No.583/2016 [CIS (N.I.) No.5437/2020], whereby, the petitioner
has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I.
[2024:RJ-JP:3157] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1413/2023]
Act and sentenced to undergo nine months' simple imprisonment
alongwith a fine of Rs.7,60,000/- and in default of payment of
which, he was ordered to further undergo three months' simple
imprisonment.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was prosecuted
for committing an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act. After completion of trial, he was found guilty
and thus, was convicted and sentenced by the learned trial court.
The judgment of conviction was assailed by the petitioner by way
of filing a criminal appeal but the same has been partly allowed
vide judgment dated 05.08.2023, hence, the petitioner preferred
the present revision petition.
3. The parties have entered into a compromise and have settled
the dispute amicably. Copy of compromise has been placed on
record. Parties have resolved the dispute since the petitioner has
paid the due amount satisfying the respondent-claimant. As per
Section 147 of the N.I. Act, an offence under Section 138 of the
N.I. Act is compoundable without taking permission of the Court.
Thus, it is jointly prayed that both the judgments be quashed and
set aside.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material
available on record and gone through both the judgments as well
as the compromise, wherein, it is recited that the parties have
resolved their dispute amicably and the complainant does not wish
to continue the proceedings.
5. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties
and the statutory provision in this regard, the revision petition is
allowed. The the judgment dated 05.08.2023 passed by learned
[2024:RJ-JP:3157] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1413/2023]
Additional District & Sessions Judge No.8, Jaipur Metropolitan-II in
Criminal Appeal No.31/2023 (CIS No.146/2023) and the judgment
of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.02.2023 passed by
the learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases)
No.10, Jaipur Metroplitan-II in Criminal Case No.583/2016 [CIS
(N.I.) No.5437/2020] are quashed and set aside. The accused is
acquitted from the charges.
6. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
120-ASHWINI KUMAR CHOUHAN /680
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!