Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5315 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:34281]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1677/2024
1. Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Sunda Ram, Aged About 24
Years, Resident Of Amanipura, Post- Dansroli, Tehsil-
Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj).
2. Kiran Samota D/o Ramniwas, Aged About 23 Years,
Resident Of Prempura, Post- Dansroli, Tehsil -
Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj). At Present Living In
Relationship With Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Sunda Ram,
Aged 24 Years, Resident Of Amanipura, Post- Dansroli,
Tehsil- Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar.
4. S.h.o., Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar.
5. Ramniwas Samota S/o Bhinwa Ram, Aged About 50
Years, R/o Prempura, Post- Dansroli, Tehsil-
Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj).
6. Yogesh S/o Ramniwas Samota, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Prempura, Post- Dansroli, Tehsil- Dantaramgarh, District
Sikar (Raj).
7. Ramniwas Chandeliya S/o Jagdish Chandeliya, Aged
About 40 Years, R/o Chandeliya Bas, Tehsil-
Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramdhan Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
13/08/2024
Heard and considered.
Vide the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ
Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena & Anr. Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court issued directions
specifying the mechanisms/remedies which may be invoked by the
[2024:RJ-JP:34281] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1677/2024]
person(s) who seek the implementation of measures to ensure
their safety, on account of extra-legal threats to their lives or
liberty from other social actors or groups. Therefore, the matter is
no longer res integra, and is squarely covered by the directions of
this Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra).
This Court observes that in the present case, the
petitioner(s) has/have failed to comply with the directions of this
Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra). Further, the
Registry has failed to ensure that the petition includes due
pleadings and a footnote disclosing the details which indicate that
the alternative efficacious remedies have already been availed of
in accordance with the directions of this Court in Suman Meena
(supra).
Accordingly, in terms of the judgment pronounced in Suman
Meena (supra), the instant petition is disposed of. Pending
applications, if any, stand disposed of.
A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar (Judicial) to
ensure compliance with the directions issued by this Court in
Suman Meena (supra) regarding the contents of the petitions
wherein directions are sought pertaining to protection.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Pooja /5
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!