Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mamta vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 7549 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7549 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mamta vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 21 September, 2023
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

[2023:RJ-JD:31125]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14726/2023

1. Mamta W/o Momraj, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Shubash Marg, Mr Hotel Ke Pass, Valmiki Basti, Badi Guwad, Bikaner.

2. Pankaj Chandeliya S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Vinoba Basti, Nagar Nigam Store Ke Piche, Shanidev Mandir Ke Pass, Bikaner.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Commissioner Nagar Nigam, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Sanjay Raj Pandit
For Respondent(s)          :    ---



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

21/09/2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to

withdraw the present petition in light of the directions given by the

Division Bench of this Court vide its order dated 09.08.2019

rendered in DB Special Appeal No.1733/2018 : Virendra

Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

2. Permission granted.

3. The present petition is permitted to be withdrawn.

4. The petitioners would be free to file a representation before

the respondents within a period of two weeks from today.

5. In case, the representation is so addressed along with a

certified copy of the order instant, the respondents shall consider

[2023:RJ-JD:31125] (2 of 2) [CW-14726/2023]

petitioners' grievance in accordance with law including the

judgment passed by Division Bench in the case of Virendra Kumar

(supra).

6. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

7. The writ petition so also stay application stand dismissed

accordingly.

8. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 367-Shahenshah/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter