Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5262 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:24783]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 606/2018
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13212/2017
1. Chandrapal Singh Meena S/o Shri Shishu Pal Singh
Meena, aged about 49 years.
2. Smt. Sona Devi W/o Shri Ram Singh Meena
3. Shri Shishupal Singh Meena S/o Shri Gulab Chand
Meena , Ward Panch Ward No.13
4. Ramesh Gathala S/o Shri Baluram Gathala
5. Harinarayan S/o Shri Shyam Lal
6. Banshidhar S/o Shri Ganesh Ram
All R/o Village Gulabbadi, Gram Panchayat Mahar Khurd,
Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Shri Seva Ram Swami, Principal Secretary, Revenue
Department, Government of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. Shri Sidharth Mahajan, District Collector, Jaipur.
3. Shri Ravi Vijay Gupta, Sub-Divisional Officer, Panchayat
Samiti, Shahpura, District Jaipur.
4. Shri Surya Kant Sharma, Tehsildar, Tehsil Shahpura
District Jaipur.
5. Smt. Urmila Devi, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mahar
Khurd, Panchayat Samiti, Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
6. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt.
Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents-Contemnors
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
[2023:RJ-JP:24783] (2 of 2) [CCP-606/2018]
22/09/2023
This contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful
disobedience of the order dated 23.08.2017 whereby, the
respondents were directed to take action against the encroachers
on the pasture land of Khasra No.1448.
Learned counsel for the respondents, inviting attention of
this Court towards the 'Mauka report dated 21.09.2023', would
submit that 12 encroachers were found on the land of Khasra
No.1448, out of whom, four encroachers have already been
removed and remaining 8 encroachers have obtained interim
order(s) from this Court against their dispossession and action
would be taken against them as per law. He, therefore, prays for
dismissal of the contempt petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the
aforesaid position.
In view thereof, this Court is satisfied that there has been
substantial compliance of the order dated 23.08.2017.
Resultanlty, this contempt petition is dismissed.
The notices are discharged.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/s-269
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!