Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Indra Lohar vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 8699 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8699 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Indra Lohar vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 18 October, 2023
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2023:RJ-JD:35893]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1781/2023

1. Indra Lohar D/o Sh. Arjun Ji, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kanvera, Kundawa, Rajsamand, Rajsamand Rajasthan At Present Nandari, Jodhpur

2. Jagdish Chandra Regar S/o Sh. Sohanlal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kemari Bhilwara Umari Rajasthan At Present Nandari, Jodhpur

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

2. Superintendent Of Police, Rajsamand

3. Sho, P.s. Devgarh, Dist. Rajsamand

4. Om Prakash S/o Chunnilal, R/o Sendara Road By Pass, Beawar, Dist. Ajmer

5. Sualal S/o Raimal, R/o Kanvera Kundawa, Rajsamand

6. Chatru Lal Ji S/o Jalu Ji, Kanvera Kundawa, Rajsamand

7. Lalu Ji S/o Badri Ram, Kanvera Kundawa, Rajsamand

8. Gehri Lal S/o Sualal, R/o Kanvera Kundawa, Rajsamand

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Gour For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order

18/10/2023 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

[2023:RJ-JD:35893] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1781/2023]

threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are

their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the

Superintendent of Police, Rajsamand with a prayer to be provided

with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their

request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners

for directing the Superintendent of Police, Rajsamand to provide

protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The Superintendent of Police, Rajsamand shall have the

matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection

shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The

Superintendent of Police, Rajsamand shall ensure that no harm is

caused to the petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 985-Ravi Khandelwal

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter