Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Modern Institute Of Veterinary ... vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 7922 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7922 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Modern Institute Of Veterinary ... vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 4 October, 2023
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2023:RJ-JD:32465]                   (1 of 2)                    [CW-15506/2023]


      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                            JODHPUR
            S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15506/2023

Modern Institute Of Veterinary Sciences, Mukundgarh Mandi,
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan Being Run And Managed By Modern Public
School Shikshan Samiti Mukundgarh Mandi, Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan Through Its Secretary Raman Kumar S/o Shri
Shubhkarn, Aged 50 Years, R/o Mukundgarh (Rural),
Mukundgarh, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
                                                   ----Petitioner
                            Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Animal
       Husbandry Department, Jaipur.
2.     Deputy Secretary To The Government, Department Of
       Animal Husbandry, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.     Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences,
       Bikaner Through Its Registrar.
                                               ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Ms. Swati Shekhar.



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

04/10/2023

1.    Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution submits that

the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already

been decided by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of

Professor S Karan Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.24692/2018) decided on

09.04.2019.

2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution submits that

the issue involved in this writ petition is no more res-integra in

view of the adjudication by a Constitution Bench of the Apex Court

of the land in the case of Islamic Academy of Education Vs. State

of Karnataka : 2003 (6) SCC 679, which reads thus:




                     (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 06:55:29 AM)
                                    [2023:RJ-JD:32465]                      (2 of 2)                     [CW-15506/2023]


                                              "25. Privately managed educational institutions imparting
                                              professional education in the fields of (33) medicine,
                                              dentistry and engineering have spurted in the last few
                                              decades. The right of the minorities to establish an
                                              institution of their own choice in terms of clause(1) of
                                              Article 30 of the Constitution of India is recognized; so is
                                              the right of a citizen who intends to establish an institution
                                              under Article 19(1)(g) thereof. However, the fundamental
                                              right of a citizen to establish an educational institution and
                                              in particular a professional institution is not absolute.
                                              These rights are subject to regulations and laws imposing
                                              reasonable restrictions. Such reasonable restriction in
                                              public interest can be imposed under Clause (6) of Article
                                              19 and regulations under Article 30 of the Constitution of
                                              India. The right to establish an educational institution,
                                              although guaranteed under the Constitution, recognition
                                              of affiliation is not. Recognition or affiliation of professional
                                              institution must be in terms of statute."


                                   3.    Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution submits that

                                   the petitioner-institution will file the detail representation before

                                   the respondents within a period of fifteen days from today and the

                                   respondents may be directed to consider its representation in the

                                   light of the judgment passed in the case of Professor S Karan

                                   Shiksha Samiti (supra).


                                   4.    In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the

                                   petitioner-institution, respondents are directed to decide the

                                   representation of the petitioner-institution in accordance with law


                                   preferably within a period of three months from the date of

                                   receiving representation along with certified copy of this order.


                                   5.    The writ petition as well as stay petition are disposed of.



                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

597-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter