Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9281 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:38582]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3821/2020
Ms Wood Opposite Swaraj Tractor, Sikodara Anand Via Proprietor Mohsin Hasan S/o Hamzabhai Bodeliwala, By Caste Muslim, Age About 31 Years R/o 401, Sharnam Bless, Beside 7 Seas Mall, Fatehgarh (Fatehganj), Vadodara, Gujarat.
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Dr. RDSS Kharlia
Ms. Kinjal Purohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
07/11/2023
1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 09.06.2020 passed
byv learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gaulabpura, District
Bhilwara in Criminal Revision Petition No.06/2020 uphelding the
order dated 12.03.2020 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Gulabpura in FIR No.35/2020 registered at Police
Station Gulabpuar,District Bhilwara whereby the application filed
by the petitioner for Supurdgi of truck and woods was rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the
nakabandi complainant and his team searched a truck bearing
registered number GJ 06 VV 9121 and found timber wood. It was
further submitted that the police authority has wrongly seized the
timber wood and vehicle in question. Learned counsel for the
[2023:RJ-JD:38582] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3821/2020]
petitioner also submits that petitioner filed an application before
learned trial court for taking the wood and truck on Supurdgi but
trial court vide order dated 12.03.2020 has wrongly dismissed the
said application. He further submits that petitioner had filed
revision against the said order before learned Additional Sessions
Judge, Gulabpura, District Bhilwara who vide order dated
09.06.2020 dismissed the revision petition. He further submits
that timber wood and truck are lying in open place at Police
Station. They would be destroyed by weather. No useful purpose
would be served to retain them in the Police Station. So, the order
of learned trial court as well as revisional court be set aside.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments
advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that
orders of learned trial court as well as revisional court do not
suffer from any illegality or infirmity. So, petition filed by the
petitioner be dismissed.
4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned
counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and
perused the impugned orders.
5. It is an admitted position that the timber wood was being
transferred from Gujarat to Kethal, Haryana in truck. Conclusion of
trial will take time. If timberwood and truck are lying in open place
at Police Station, the same will certainly destroyed by weather
conditions.
6. Considering the submissions and following the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
AIR 2003 SC 638, the criminal misc. petition is allowed and the
[2023:RJ-JD:38582] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3821/2020]
orders of learned trial court as well as revisional court are set
aside. This Court deems it just and appropriate to release the
vehicle in question in favour of the petitioner on interim custody
till conclusion of the trial provided he furnishes a Supurdaginama
of Rs. 5,00,000/- and surety of like amount to the satisfaction of
the Court below as well as it is also directed to release the timber
wood on Supurdgi as the learned trial Court deems fit.
(FARJAND ALI),J 1021-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!