Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10156 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:41095]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4612/2019
1. Bajrang Lal S/o Shri Rai Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o
House No. 116, Gandhi Basti, Sriganganagar.
2. Mukesh Bharnava S/o Shri Ram Pratap,, Aged About 40
Years, R/o House No. 699, Khatik Mohalla, Purani Abadi,
Sriganganagar.
3. Hari Narayan S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal,, Aged About 40
Years, R/o 1-I-14, Sadbhawana Nagar, Sriganganagar.
4. Om Prakash S/o Shri Shaib Ram,, Aged About 44 Years,
R/o Narsinghpura, Padampur, Sriganganagar.
5. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Sriram,, Aged About 36 Years, R/o
House No. 51, Near Atm Bank Of India, Sriganganagar.
6. Didar Singh S/o Shri Surjeet Singh,, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Gurusar, Sriganganagar.
7. Pramod Kumar S/o Shri Dina Nath,, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o C-8, Sugarmil Colony, Sriganganagar.
8. Mohan Lal S/o Shri Jas Ram,, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Near Govt. School, Birmana, Sriganganagar.
9. Rahul Garg S/o Shri Pawan Garg,, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o 2-B-21, Jawahar Nagar, Sriganganagar.
10. Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Om Prakash,, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Manjuwas, Narsinghpura, Padampur,
Sriganganagar.
11. Smt. Jyoti Bhati W/o Shri Hari Narayan,, Aged About 35
Years, R/o 1-14, Sadbhawana Nagar, Sriganganagar.
12. Smt. Minakshi W/o Shri Mukesh Bharnawa,, Aged About
30 Years, R/o House No. 699, Opp. Ramdev Mandir,
Purani Abadi, Sriganganagar.
13. Smt. Gurpreet Kaur W/o Shri Baljinder Singh,, Aged
About 44 Years, R/o House 150, Behind Friend Cinema,
Purani Abadi, Sriganganagar.
14. Smt. Manpreet Kaur W/o Shri Jagtar Singh,, Aged About
43 Years, R/o Near School No. 7, Purani Abadi,
Sriganganagar.
15. Jaspal S/o Shri Sharwan Ram,, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Ward No. 4, 22 Lgw, B-22 Lgwb, Sriganganagar.
16. Navratan S/o Shri Nand Ballabah,, Aged About 39 Years,
(Downloaded on 30/11/2023 at 08:40:35 PM)
[2023:RJ-JD:41095] (2 of 4) [CW-4612/2019]
R/o Ward No. 34 Baba Deep Singh Colony, Sriganganagar.
17. Smt. Usha W/o Shri Rajendra Kumar,, Aged About 44
Years, R/o Karnisingh Marg, Sriganganagar.
18. Sanjeev Kumar S/o Balvindra Singh,, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Ward No. 6, Guru Nagar, Purani Abadi,
Sriganganagar.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Medical
And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services,
Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Bikaner
Zone, Bikaner.
4. The District Collector, Sri Ganganagar.
5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Sri Ganganagar.
6. The Principal Medical Officer Cum Secretary, Rmrs,
Government Hospital, Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Choudhary
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Khushi Makwana for Ms. Vandana
Bhansali, AGC
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
29/11/2023
1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the
controversy involved in this matter is squarely covered by the
judgment passed by this Court in the case of Tony Meghwal &
Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition
No.2212/2019) decided on 21.01.2021, the operative portion of
the said judgment reads as under:-
"13. Heard.
[2023:RJ-JD:41095] (3 of 4) [CW-4612/2019]
14. In considered opinion of this Court, the concern shown rather grievance raised by the petitioners is genuine and the State's action/attempt of deploying placement agencies as intermediary agencies between the petitioners and the State Government, is arbitrary, as has already been held by this Court.
15. That apart, when the State itself has come up with an order dated 02.09.2020, doing away with the placement agencies and rightly so, the proceedings of engaging placement agencies, cannot be countenanced. The same are liable to be declared illegal.
16. Petitioners are working as Data Entry Operator/Computer Operator, Lab Assistant, Ward Boy, Pharmacist, Helper, Lab Technician etc. on purely contract basis with the respondent society, namely RMRS. Introduction of placement agency would result in change in petitioners' employer.
17. All the writ petitions are hereby allowed.
18. The advertisements/E-tenders issued by the respondents for engaging the petitioners through placement agencies impugned herein are hereby quashed.
19. The State - respondents are hereby directed to continue the petitioners engagement/contract with Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, in accordance with law.
20. Needless to observe that in case regularly selected candidates are available, the State shall be free to proceed in accordance with law, including disbanding petitioners' contract or disengaging them.
21. Interlocutory application(s) also stands disposed of."
2. In light of such submission, the present petition filed by the
petitioners is disposed of in light of and with similar directions as
given in the case of Tony Meghwal (supra).
[2023:RJ-JD:41095] (4 of 4) [CW-4612/2019]
3. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of
accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
98-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!