Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10041 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:40545]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7346/2023
M/s Devnarayan Construction, Through Its Proprietor Bhairulal
Gurjar S/o Sh. Kesarlal Age 30 Years, Resident Of Post Warwada,
Tehsil Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp, Pali Mining Engineer, Mines And
Geology Department, Sojat City, Dist. Pali (Raj.).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajiv Bishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
23/11/2023
1. By way of filing of the instant miscellaneous petition,
challenge has been made to the order dated 16.11.2023 passed
by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pali in Criminal Revision
Petition No.64/2023 affirming the order dated 29.08.2023 passed
by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pali in Criminal Misc. Case
No.1179/2023, whereby the prayer made by the petitioner for
releasing the vehicle in question (Dumper) bearing registration
No.RJ-22-GC-4142, has been declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
is the owner of the vehicle in question which has been seized by
the police officials of the Police Station Sadri under Section 207 of
the Motor Vehicles Act and as per legal fiction, the vehicle under
Section 207 of the M.V. Act can be released upon showing
documents viz, registration, insurance and driving licence. Copies
[2023:RJ-JD:40545] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7346/2023]
of all the required documents have been shown before the learned
trial Court as well as this Court. It is not in dispute that the
petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle in question, is the
person best entitled to get back the possession of the seized
property. There is no other person claiming supurdagi of the
same.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the criminal
miscellaneous petition.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances and following
the judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case
of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order dated 18.11.2022 passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 2005/2022 [SLP
(Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala
& Anr., wherein, the vehicle involved in a crime under NDPS Act
was directed to be released on terms and conditions to be
determined by the Special Court, this Court deems it just and
appropriate to release the vehicle in question in favour of the
petitioner on interim custody till conclusion of the judicial
proceedings provided he furnishes a Supurdaginama of Rs.
5,00,000/- and surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the
Court below. It is further directed that the material loaded in the
Dumper shall be unloaded in the police station premises and only
vehicle in question (Dumper) bearing registration No.RJ-22-GC-
4142 may be handed over to the petitioner as it's deterioration
would be a national loss and if the State wishes to initiate any
[2023:RJ-JD:40545] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7346/2023]
proceeding for levy of any revenue, it may initiate proceeding to
this effect but only under an assumption of further legal course;
the vehicle in question cannot be allowed to stationed in an open
area of police station concerned for its natural decay.
6. With the above observations and directions, the instant Misc.
Petition stands allowed.
(FARJAND ALI),J 727-Pramod/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!