Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4521 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2023
[2023/RJJD/014890]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 181/2023
1. Basant Lal S/o Sh. Nathu, Aged About 49 Years,
2. Prakash S/o Basant Lal, aged about 25 years,
3. Shanti Lal S/o Nathu, aged about 44 years,
4. Smt. Savita W/o Basant Lal, aged about 44 years, All R/o Piplara Ps Arthuna Dist. Banswara (Presently Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Sanwalot for Mr. Brijesh Purohit.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI Order
12/05/2023 Qua applicants - Basant Lal and Prakash
1. Learned counsel for the applicants does not press the bail
application qua applicants - Basant Lal and Prakash S/o Basant
Lal.
2. The application seeking suspension of sentence qua
applicants - Basant Lal and Prakash is dismissed as not pressed.
Qua applicants - Shanti Lal and Smt. Savita
1. The appellants-applicants herein have been convicted and
sentenced as below vide judgment dated 27.1.2023 passed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Banswara, in Sessions Case
No.131/2018:
[2023/RJJD/014890] (2 of 4) [SOSA-181/2023]
Offences Sentence Fine
147 IPC 2 years R.I. Rs.2,000/- and in default of
which to further undergo 2
months R.I.
148 IPC 2 years R.I. Rs.3,000/- and in default of
which to further undergo 3
months R.I.
447/149 IPC 3 months R.I. Rs.500/- and in default of
which to further undergo one
month R.I.
323/149 IPC 1 year R.I. Rs.1,000/- and in default of
which to further undergo 2
months R.I.
302/149 IPC Life Imprisonment Rs.1,00,000/- and in default
of which to further undergo 6
months R.I.
2. The appellants-applicants have preferred the application for
suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. for release on
bail during the pendency of the appeal.
3. Qua applicants Shanti Lal and Smt. Savita, submissions have
been made that co-accused Smt. Rangana W/o of Shanti Lal
against whom similar allegations were made as against the
applicants has been granted suspension of sentence by this Court
in D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal)
No.124/2023 and case of the present applicants is not different
from said Smt. Rangana, wherein, the complainant in her
statement made specific allegations that fatal injury on the body
of deceased, were made by Basant Lal and Prakash and the only
allegation against the present applicants were that they were part
of unlawful assembly along with Smt. Rangana, Kalpesh and
Kamal and against Kalpesh and Kamal, no charge-sheet was filed.
[2023/RJJD/014890] (3 of 4) [SOSA-181/2023]
4. Further submissions were made that applicant - Savita was
on bail during trial and applicant - Shanti Lal is in custody for over
5 years now, the hearing of the appeal is likely to take sufficiently
long time and, therefore, applicants may be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions.
6. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of
the case and after carefully scrutinizing the record of the case and
likelihood of hearing of the appeal taking substantially long time,
without making observation on the merit, we consider it just and
proper to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the
appellants - applicants Shanti Lal and Smt. Savita during the
pendency of the appeal.
7. Accordingly, the instant application for suspension of
sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed qua
applicants - Shanti Lal and Smt. Savita and it is ordered that
sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Banswara, in Sessions Case No.131/2018 against the appellants -
applicants Shanti Lal and Smt. Savita, shall remain suspended till
final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on
bail, provided they executes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance in this court
on 12/06/2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal
of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:
1. That they will appear before the trial court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed
[2023/RJJD/014890] (4 of 4) [SOSA-181/2023]
address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s) they will give in writing their changed address to the trial court.
8. The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of
the accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as
Criminal Misc. Case relating to original case in which the accused-
applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also
be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall
not been taken into account for statistical purpose relating to
pendency and disposal of the cases in the trial court. In case the
said accused-applicant did not appear before the trial court,
learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for
cancellation of bail.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (ARUN BHANSALI),J 14-Sumit/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!