Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2649 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2023
[2023/RJJP/003749]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 75/2023
Vijay Kasana S/o Shibbu Gurjar, R/o Gram Bhojpura, Police
Station Sikandara District Dausa (Raj) (At Present Confined In
District Jail, Dausa)
----Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp
2. Susheel Meena S/o Sh. Motilal Meena, R/o Village Dolika,
Sikandara District Dausa (Raj)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shibbu Gurjar, father of the appellant present in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
03/03/2023
In "Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal versus Union of India and Anr.
2003(2) SCC 45, Apex Court has held that lawyers have no right
to go on strike or to give a call for boycott of Courts. Calls given
by Bar Association or Bar Council for such purpose cannot require
the Court to adjourn the matters. In "Krishnakant Tamrakar
Versus The State of Maddhya Pradesh" decided by the Apex Court
on 28.03.2018. The Apex Court has held that strike by advocates
is in violation of law laid down by the Apex Court and the same
tentamounts to contempt. The Apex Court has further held that
the office bearers are liable to be removed from the office for
passing resolution for strike. In view of the judgment of Apex
Court in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal 3401 and 'Krishnakant Tamrakar
[2023/RJJP/003749] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-75/2023]
Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh" since the advocates are
abstaining from work since 21.02.2023, this Court deems it proper
to pass order on merits.
The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A(2)
SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant,
who is in custody in connection with FIR No.533/2022 Police
Station Sikandara District Dausa for the offences under Sections
323, 341, 386, 379, 34 & 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S)
of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
It is submitted by representative of the appellant that the
appellant has falsely been implicated in this case and he has been
in judicial custody since 22.11.2022. He further submits that after
investigation, charge sheet has been filed in the matter. He further
submits that trial will take considerable time, and therefore, the
benefit of bail may be granted to the appellant.
Per contra, learned learned Public Prosecutor opposed the
bail application.
Despite having been informed about hearing of this bail
appeal, no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant.
Heard. Perused the material available on record.
Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances as
available on record and the fact that the charge sheet has been
filed in this matter and trial will take considerable time, this Court
is of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on
bail.
Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 20.12.2022 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST
(Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Dausa is set aside. It is ordered
[2023/RJJP/003749] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-75/2023]
that the accused-appellant- Vijay Kasana S/o Shri Shibbu
Gurjar arrested in connection with aforesaid FIR, shall be released
on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a
personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/-
each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the
stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and
as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
ANAND TANWAR /16
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!