Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2587 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2023
[2023/RJJP/003584]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 849/2022
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12386/2017
Ramavtar Gurjar S/o Shri Kalyan Sahai Gurjar, Aged About 39
Years, R/o 521/30, Shiv Colony, Jhalana Doongari, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Ujjawal Rathore, Director Cum Joint Secretary,
Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan, G-3,
Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme, Near Civil Line
Phatak, Jaipur.
2. Shri Mahendra Soni, Commissioner, Jaipur Municipal
Corporation, Greater, Lalkothi, Jaipur.
3. Shri Chand Mal Verma, Managing Director, Jaipur Zila
Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. Near Gandhi Nagar
Railway Station, Jaipur.
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Present in person For Respondent(s) : Ms. Benny T.A., Dy. Manager(Legal), Jaipur Dairy Ms. Archana for Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment
02/03/2023
For the reasons stated in the application No.3/2023, the
same is allowed. The documents appended with the application
are taken on record.
[2023/RJJP/003584] (2 of 2) [CCP-849/2022]
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the
applications filed by the petitioner for allotment of dairy booth
could not be decided in view of an interim order of this Court in
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.45/2022: Gujarat Cooperative Milk
Federation Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. whereby, the
respondents have been restrained from allotting the dairy booths
in the city of Jaipur till further order. She submits that as soon as
the interim order is vacated or the aforesaid writ petition is
decided finally in their favour, they would immediately process the
applications filed by the petitioners within a period of two weeks
thereafter.
The petitioner is an agreement with the submission made by
the learned counsel for the respondents.
Heard. Considered.
This Court has, vide order dated 14.02.2022, directed the
respondents to take a decision on the applications filed by the
petitioner for allotment of the dairy booth. The applications could
not be decided in view of an interim order of this Court in S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.45/2022 as stated in Para No.4 of the reply
filed by the respondents to the contempt petition.
The contempt petition is dismissed accordingly.
However, the respondents shall decide the applications filed
by the petitioner for allotment of dairy booth within the period of
two weeks as undertaken by them in the eventuality as stated
hereinabove.
Notices are discharged.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Sudha/110
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!