Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2261 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 234/2016
Lrs Of Ladu Ram And Anr.
----Appellant Versus State And Ors.
----Respondent For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
16/03/2023
Lawyers are abstaining from work.
None has appeared for the appellant.
Office has pointed out an objection that the present appeal
has been preferred by the legal representatives of late Shri Ladu
Ram whereas the cause title in the impugned judgment does not
reflect their names.
A reply to the office objection has been filed by learned
counsel for the appellant wherein it has been submitted that
although the appellant Ladu Ram had expired on 22.09.2011, that
is, before the passing of the impugned judgment dated
30.04.2016, the steps for substitution of the legal representatives
could not be taken before the Trial Court. It has been prayed that
the legal representatives of the deceased appellant Ladu Ram be
permitted to pursue the present appeal and the office objection be
overruled.
(2 of 2) [CSA-234/2016]
In view of the submission made, the office objection No.4 is
kept in abeyance for the time being subject to any objection being
raised by the opposite party.
List the appeal for admission after two weeks.
(REKHA BORANA),J 28-Sachin/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!