Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Banwari Son Of Shambhu Lal vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 9 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Banwari Son Of Shambhu Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 2 January, 2023
Bench: Farjand Ali
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension of Sentence Application
                             No. 1354/2021
                                       In
               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2150/2021

Banwari Son Of Shambhu Lal, Resident Of Bhanwariya Kuwa,
Police Station Talera, District Bundi (Raj) (At Present In District
Jail Bundi)
                                                                  ----Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
                                                                ----Respondent
For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. N.K. Sharma
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Rajendra Yadav, GA-cum-AAG


              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
                           Order

02/01/2023

Heard learned counsel for the accused appellant and learned

Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence

and perused the judgment impugned dated 16.12.2021 passed by

learned District Judge, Special Court, POSCO Act, 2012 whereby

the accused appellant has been convicted for the offence

punishable under sections 376D IPC and has been sentenced to

maximum twenty years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of

Rs.50,000/- as well as for the offence punishable under Section

366, and 376(DA) of IPC.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that prosecutrix,

PW-3-'M' as well as her parents have not supported the story of

the prosecution and turned hostile. There is no ocular or

documentary evidence for which it can be said that the same is

(2 of 3) [SOSA-1354/2021]

sufficient to bring on the guilt of the accused appellant. The

learned trial Court has acquitted the co-accused person Sonu from

all accusations. The appellant has also been acquitted from the

charge of offence under Section 376 DA however convicted for

charge under Section 376 D but no sufficient material is there to

prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the prayer

made by learned counsel for the accused-appellant.

The appellant was on bail during trial and at present he is

confined in jail and has never misused the liberty granted to him

and the hearing of appeal is likely to take further more time,

therefore, considering the overall submissions and looking to the

totality of facts and circumstances of the case while refraining

from passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the

defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect

on hearing of the appeal, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit

case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused

appellant.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the learned District Judge, Special Court,

POSCO Act, 2012, vide judgment dated 16.12.2021 in Sessions

Case No.41/2020 against the appellant-applicant Banwari Son Of

Shambhu Lal shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for his appearance in this court on 03.02.2023 and

(3 of 3) [SOSA-1354/2021]

whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial

Court in the month of January of every year till the

appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of

residence, he/she/they will give in writing

his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as

well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their

address(s),they will give in writing their changed

address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the

accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicants does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J

PREETI VALECHA /09

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter