Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 75 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 256/2022
Omprakash @ O.p. Meena S/o Shri Girraj Prasad Meena, R/o
Patti Kalan, Police Station Bamanwas, Tehsil Bamanwas, District
Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur
(Raj.) Through His Younger Brother Rishiraj Meena S/o Shri
Girraj Prasad Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bamanwas Patti
Kalan, Police Station Bamanwas, Tehsil Bamanwas, District
Sawaimadhopur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home,
Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director General Of Prisons Directorate Prisons
Ghatgate, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
03/01/2023
Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court
contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, instant
petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the
impugned order 10.03.2022 passed by the Open Air Camp
Advisory Committee (for short 'the Committee') whereby the
application filed by the petitioner for his transfer to Open Air Camp
has been rejected on the ground that two other criminal cases are
pending against the petitioner.
(2 of 3) [CRLW-256/2022]
Counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of
other cases cannot be a ground to refuse the prayer of the
petitioner to shift him to open air camp. Counsel submits that jail
conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory. In support of his
contentions, he has placed reliance on the judgments passed by
this Court in case of Wasim Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
:S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 514/2022 decided on
13.10.2022, Himanshu @ Lovely Vs. State of Rajasthan and
Ors. : S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 295/2022 decided on
27.09.2022 and Bhinva Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. :
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1460/2021 decided on
18.10.2021. Counsel submits that proper directions be issued to
the authorities to shift the petitioner to Open Air Camp.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the
prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and has
submitted that as per Rule 3 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air
Camp Rules, 1972 (for short 'the Rules of 1972'), the petitioner is
not entitled to be shifted to the Open Air Camp and no illegality
has been caused by the authorities while rejecting the application
filed by the petitioner because two other criminal cases are
pending against him.
Learned Public Prosecutor could not dispute the
aforesaid factual and legal proposition as already laid down by this
Court in the cases of Wasim (supra), Himanshu @ Lovely (supra)
and Bhinva Ram (supra).
Mere pendency of a criminal case is no bar for transfer
of a prison to Open Air Camp. Since the petitioner does not suffer
any of the ineligibility provided under Rule 3 of the Rules of 1972
(3 of 3) [CRLW-256/2022]
and rather, fulfills the eligibility criteria as laid down under Rule 4
of Rules of 1972, this criminal writ petition deserves to be allowed.
Resultantly, this criminal writ petition is allowed. The
impugned order dated 10.03.2022 passed by the Prisoners Open
Air Camp Advisory Committee is quashed and set aside qua the
petitioner. The respondents are directed to transfer the petitioner
from Central Jail, Jaipur to Open Air Camp immediately.
With the aforesaid directions, this Criminal Writ Petition
stands allowed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
MR/72
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!