Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajit Singh Chauhan Son Of Shri ... vs The State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 630 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 630 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Ajit Singh Chauhan Son Of Shri ... vs The State Of Rajasthan on 18 January, 2023
Bench: Ashok Kumar Gaur
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13757/2019

Ajit Singh Chauhan Son of Shri Shivpal Singh Chauhan, Aged

About 28 Years, Resident of 152/184, Cement Factory, Sahu

Nagar, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.     The State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary Cum

       Commissioner, Department of Panchayati Raj, Secretariat,

       Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.     Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sawai Madhopur,

       Rajasthan.
                                                                ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Shashi Kant Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms.Sunita Satyarthi, Addl. Govt.

Counsel.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR

Order 18/01/2023

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

challenging the orders dated 16.04.2018, 18.07.2019 and

08.08.2019, whereby the respondents have given direction to

recover two annual grade increment from salary of the petitioner

on account of not passing the computer typing test after his

appointment on compassionate grounds.

This Court, while issuing notices in the writ petition,

had stayed the operation of impugned orders dated 08.08.2019,

18.07.2019 and 16.04.2018.

(2 of 5) [CW-13757/2019]

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the Misc.

Application No.1/2022, whereby an order dated 05.04.2022 has

been placed on record with regard to passing of computer typing

test by the petitioner. The petitioner has also annexed the

certificate to the same effect issued by the Addl. District Collector,

Sawai Madhopur.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

impugned orders which were issued by the respondents, were not

in consonance with the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of

Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996

(hereafter 'the Rules of 1996').

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted

that the recovery notices issued against the petitioner were also

not preceded by any notice to the petitioner.

Learned counsel further submitted that now on account

of passing the computer typing test, the petitioner is entitled for

grant of regular annual grade increment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted

that the petitioner, on the basis of certificate issued by the

Vardhman Mahaveer Open University (VMOU), Kota in acquiring

qualification of RS-CIT i.e. Rajasthan State Certificate in

Information Technology, was given compassionate appointment by

an order dated 01.02.2012 and later on, on completion of

probation period, the petitioner was granted regular salary in pay

scale of Rs.5200-20200/- with Grade Pay of Rs.2400/-.

Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner also

acquired qualification of Master of Computer Applications (MCA)

from Jaipur National University in the June, 2014.

(3 of 5) [CW-13757/2019]

Learned counsel submitted that as per circular/order

dated 21.09.2010 issued by the Department of Personnel (DOP),

the person having qualification of computer course, were required

to be considered for compassionate appointment and if such

candidate did not have qualification of computer course, one year

period was allowed to them to pass the said computer course.

Learned counsel submitted that even according to the

said circular, the petitioner had already got RS-CIT Certificate and

as such, he could not have been deprived to get the benefit of

annual grade increment as appointment of the petitioner was

made regular for all the purposes and there was no requirement of

passing the computer typing test.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed

reliance on judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.10333/2017 decided by the order dated 04.04.2019.

Learned counsel submitted that the said order passed by the

Single Bench has also been approved by the Division Bench of

Principal Seat at Jodhpur in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ)

No.13/2020 (State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Ramesh

Chandra Regar) dated 22.11.2021 along-with other connected

appeal.

Learned counsel, on the strength of said judgment,

submitted that the impugned orders passed by the respondents

were contrary to the circular issued by the DOP dated 21.09.2010.

Learned Addl. Govt. Counsel appearing for the

respondents-State Ms.Sunita Satyarthi does not deny the fact of

passing of computer typing test by the petitioner in the year 2022.

(4 of 5) [CW-13757/2019]

Learned Addl. Govt. Counsel submitted that at the time

of passing of the impugned orders, the Authorities did not commit

any illegality and it was incumbent on the petitioner to pass the

requisite computer typing test for getting benefit of annual grade

increment.

Learned Addl. Govt. Counsel further submitted that

only on account of interim order being passed by this Court, the

petitioner cannot be conferred to get the benefit for which he was

not entitled.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the material available on record.

This Court finds that the respondents did not keep in

mind the circular which was issued by the DOP on 21.09.2010 and

as such, without application of mind, the recovery orders were

issued against the petitioner of annual grade increment, which

were paid to the petitioner after his confirmation.

This Court finds that the petitioner after filing of the

present writ petition has passed the computer typing test and to

the same effect, certificate has also been issued. The initial basis

of impugned orders no more survive and further the interim order

passed by this Court had also protected the recovery of annual

grade increment from salary of the petitioner.

This Court, in view of subsequent developments which

have taken place after passing of the order, finds that now the

petitioner may not be deprived to get the benefit of annual grade

increment.

This Court, accordingly allows the present writ petition

and the impugned orders dated 18.07.2019 and 08.08.2019 are

(5 of 5) [CW-13757/2019]

quashed and set aside. The petitioner would be entitled for annual

grade increment as was rightly given to him before passing the

impugned orders.

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR), J Himanshu Soni/65

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter