Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 557 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.
564/2022
In
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1889/2022
Mukesh Choudhary S/o Sh. Mangalchand Choudhary, R/o College
Link Road, Near Mangal Mishra Cotton Press, Beawar District
Ajmer (Raj) (At Present Confined At Central Jail Ajmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Raghunath Singh @ Raghuvir Singh S/o Sh. Sawai Singh,
R/o Gram Bhojpura, Nundri Maldev, Tehsil Beawar, District
Ajmer (Raj)
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pravind Kumar
Mr. B.N. Sandu
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahla, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
16/01/2023
Despite notice has been served upon the respondent but no
one has appeared on his behalf.
Heard learned counsel for the accused petitioner and learned
Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence
and perused the judgment impugned dated 29.03.2019 passed by
learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Beawar, Ajmer whereby
the accused petitioner has been convicted for the offence
punishable under sections 138 of NI Act and has been sentenced
to maximum one year simple imprisonment along with fine of
(2 of 3) [SOSR-564/2022]
Rs. 2,45,000/- and in default of payment of fine, one month
additional SI.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the
petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 50,000/- under protest to the
complainant. He is behind the bars for more than six months and
the total sentence is not more than one year.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the prayer
made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner.
The accused-petitioner is behind the bars and the hearing of
case is likely to take further more time, therefore, considering the
overall submissions and looking to the totality of facts and
circumstances of the case while refraining from passing any
comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the
prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of
the case, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for
suspending the sentence awarded to the accused petitioner.
Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed
under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the
sentences passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 3,
Beawar, Ajmer, vide judgment dated 29.03.2019 in Sessions
Appeal No. 63/2015 against the petitioner-applicant Mukesh
Choudhary S/o Sh. Mangalchand Choudhary shall remain
suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid petition and he shall
be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this
court on 17.02.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the
disposal of the petition on the conditions indicated below:-
(3 of 3) [SOSR-564/2022]
1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial
Court in the month of January of every year till the
petition is decided.
2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of
residence, he/she/they will give in writing
his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as
well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their
address(s),they will give in writing their changed
address to the trial Court.
4. He shall deposit the amount of Rs.50,000/-
with the trial court as a condition precedent to
release him on bail.
(FARJAND ALI),J
PREETI VALECHA /120
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!