Panni Jakhar vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1134 Raj

[2023/RJJD/002938]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1742/2023

1. Panni Jakhar D/o Naga Ram Jakhar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Dhanau, Teh. Chohtan, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2011 Jaisalmer.

2. Anita D/o Likhama Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Ramsar Kalau, Teh. Shergarh, Dist. Jodhpur, Fc 2016 Jaisalmer.

3. Meena D/o Moola Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Rateu, Teh. Gida, Dist. Barmer, Fc 976 Jaisalmer.

4. Laxmi D/o Ramchardra Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post Khara, Teh. Phalodi, Dist. Jodhpur, Fc 977 Jaisalmer.

5. Parmeshwari D/o Rama Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mithi Beri Goliya Jetmal, Teh. Gudamalani, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2039 Jaisalmer.

6. Lehro D/o Moola Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Rateu, Teh. Gida, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2045 Jaisalmer.

7. Khetu D/o Durga Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Mevanagar, Teh. Pachpadra, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2036 Jaisalmer.

8. Rupon D/o Bhera Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Surte Ki Bery Dudhu, Teh. Dhorimnna, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2010 Jaisalmer

9. Banu Kumari D/o Rana Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Padampura, Teh. Bhaniyana, Dist. Jaisalmer, Fc 2009 Jaisalmer.

10. Premi D/o Bhoora Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Jasder, Teh. Baytu, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2031 Jaisalmer.

11. Nenu Kumari D/o Ada Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Janiyon Ki Dhani, Nimbalkot, Teh. Sindhari, Dist. Barmer, Fc 954 Jaisalmer.

12. Maina Manju D/o Amrit Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Dholiya , Teh. Pokran, Dist. Jaisalmer, Fc 986 Jaisalmer.

13. Hemlata D/o Kheta Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o

[2023/RJJD/002938] (2 of 5) [CW-1742/2023]

Village And Post Choukhaniyon Ki Dhani Nand, Teh. Barmer, Dist. Barmer , Fc 969 Jaisalmer.

14. Bhanwari D/o Deraj Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Mangle Ki Beri, Teh. Gudamalani, Dist. Barmer, Fc 961 Jaisalmer.

15. Aarti Kumari D/o Surendra Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Purani Basti Chanana, Teh. Chirwa, Dist. Jhunjhunu, Fc 960 Jaisalmer.

16. Manisha D/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Dholiya, Teh. Pokran, Dist. Jaisalmer, Fc 2044 Jaisalmer.

17. Anasi Kumari D/o Choona Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Dungroniyo Ki Dhani Sawau, Padam Singh, Teh. Baytu, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2043 Jaisalmer.

18. Paru D/o Jiya Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Taratra, Teh. Chohtan, Dist. Barmer , Fc 2007 Jaisalmer.

19. Meena Kumari W/o Sumer Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Bass Kirtan,sardarpura, Teh. Rajgarh, Dist. Churu , Fc 2024 Jaisalmer.

20. Sunita Kumari W/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village And Post Purani Basti Chanana, Teh. Chirawa, Dist. Jhunjhunu , Fc 2040 Jaisalmer.

21. Sunita Kumari D/o Surendra Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Purani Basti Chanana, Teh. Chirawa, Dist. Jhunjhunu , Fc 2001 Jaisalmer.

22. Leela D/o Manohar Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Pilawa, Teh. Lohawat, Dist. Jodhpur, Fc 2038 Jaisalmer.

23. Remti D/o Shambhu Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post Magne Ki Dhani Kurla, Teh. Barmer, Dist. Barmer , Fc 979 Jaisalmer.

24. Indra Kumari D/o Durga Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Darjiyon Ki Dhani, Teh. Baytu, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2041 Jaisalmer.

25. Manak Charan D/o Madhu Dan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Burdi, Teh Jayal, Dist. Nagaur, Fc 998 Jaisalmer.

26. Santosh D/o Dana Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village

[2023/RJJD/002938] (3 of 5) [CW-1742/2023]

And Post Bhinyad, Teh. Shiv, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2046 Jaisalmer.

27. Chaini D/o Natha Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Jasder Baytu Chimanji, Teh. Baytu, Dist. Barmer, Fc 2018 Jaisalmer.

28. Suwa Panwar D/o Bhakhar Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/ o Village And Post Palli, Teh. Lohawat, Dist. Jodhpur, Fc 2042 Jaisalmer.

29. Poonam W/o Devendra Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Dulchas, Teh Jhunjhunu, Dist. Jhunjhunu, Fc 2048 Jaisalmer.

30. Kirana Devi D/o Kuna Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Ramrawas Khurd, Teh. Pipad City, Dist. Jodhpur, Fc 2026 Jaisalmer.

31. Kamla D/o Bagsa Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Dhandhan, Teh Fatehpur, Dist. Sikar, Fc 2027 Jaisalmer. At Present Fc 201 Churu.

32. Usha Yadav D/o Ramavtar Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Udpuri, Teh. Nagar, Dist. Bhartpur, Fc 2014 Jaisalmer. At Present Fc 1451 Alwar.

33. Jambheshwari Vishnoi D/o Banshi Lal Vishnoi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Veerava, Teh. Chitalwana, Dist. Jalore, Fc 2008 Jaisalmer.

34. Gemer Lal S/o Gunesha Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Geeta Ashram Kachchi Basti, Teh. Jaisalmer, Dist. Jaisalmer, Fc 975 Jaisalmer.

35. Magha Ram S/o Rawata Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Rohidala/jaisindar Station, Teh. Gadra Road, Dist. Barmer, Fc 985 Jaisalmer.

36. Banshi Lal S/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Ward No 23 Karni Colony Khajuwala Teh. Khajuwala Dist. Bikaner Fc 959 Jaisalmer.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur.

[2023/RJJD/002938] (4 of 5) [CW-1742/2023]

3. Inspector General Of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur.

4. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaisalmer.

5. The Superintendent Of Police, Churu.

6. The Superintendent Of Police, Alwar.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.R. Choudhary

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

30/01/2023

1. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that

the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the

judgment rendered in the case of Dara Singh v. State of

Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11973/2012)

decided on 17.12.2012.

2. In the case of Dara Singh (supra), a coordinate Bench

of this Court, inter-alia, directed as under :-

"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that realizing the mistake, appointment has been given, thus, grievance of petitioner to that extent is redressed, but appointment should have been made effective from the date candidates lesser in merit were given appointment with notional benefits.

In view of the prayer made and taking note of the order dated 13.12.2012 whereby petitioner is given appointment realizing mistake by the respondents, I consider it proper to direct that aforesaid appointment should be treated from the date when lesser meritorious candidates were given. The petitioner would, accordingly, be entitled to the notional benefits and seniority from the date persons with less merit were given appointment. The actual benefits would be

[2023/RJJD/002938] (5 of 5) [CW-1742/2023]

allowed from the date of joining pursuant to the order dated 13.12.2012.

With the aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of."

3. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed

by the petitioners is disposed of with similar directions as given in

the case of Dara Singh (supra).

4. The order has been passed based on the submissions

made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine

the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in

case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of

accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 151-Mak/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)