Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vijay S/O Harisingh vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 2465 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2465 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Vijay S/O Harisingh vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 February, 2023
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2023/RJJP/003478]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

    S. B. Cr. Misc. Suspension of Sentence Appl. No. 936/2021

                                           in

                     S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1516/2021

Vijay S/o Harisingh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Beriya Khedi
Mohanpura P.s. Suthaliya District Rajgarh M.p At Present Jhuggi
Jhopri Sarvdharm Mohalla Sector-B, Bhopal P.s. Kolar District
Bhopal M.p (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Kota)
                                                                      ----Appellant
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
                                                                    ----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Brother of the appellant present in person.

For Respondent(s)             :    Mr. Arvind Kumar, PP



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

                                        Order

28/02/2023

Lawyers are abstaining from appearing before the Court.

Heard learned Public Prosecutor on the application for

suspension of sentence and perused the judgment impugned

dated 15.09.2021 passed by learned Special Judge, POCSO No. 2.

Kota, whereby the accused appellant has been convicted and

sentenced to suffer maximum punishment of 14 years rigorous

imprisonment with fine of Rs.25,000/ under Section 5(L)/6 of

POCSO Act and lesser punishment for other offence under Section

363 and 366 of IPC.

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the prayer

made by learned counsel for the accused-appellant.

[2023/RJJP/003478] (2 of 3) [SOSA-936/2021]

The Victim S when examined under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has

stated that she used to be treated cruelly by her parents and she

was married with a drunken person, the said document is marked

as P/7. She lived for a considerable long time with the appellant,

thus, a safe inference of consent can easily be drawn. There are

several discrepancies and grounds raised with regard to the age of

the victim.

The accused-appellant is behind the bars and the hearing of

appeal is likely to take further more time, therefore, considering

the overall submissions and looking to the totality of facts and

circumstances of the case while refraining from passing any

comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the

prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of

the appeal, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for

suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO No. 2.

Kota, vide judgment dated 15.09.2021 in Sessions Case

No.473/2018 against the appellant-applicant-Vijay S/o Harisingh

shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal

and he shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his

appearance in this court on 28.03.2023 and whenever ordered to

do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated

below:-

[2023/RJJP/003478] (3 of 3) [SOSA-936/2021]

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial

Court in the month of January of every year till the

appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of

residence, he/she/they will give in writing

his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as

well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their

address(s),they will give in writing their changed

address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the

accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicants does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J

Pcg/73

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter