Rakesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1416 Raj

[2023/RJJD/004085]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16868/2022

Rakesh Kumar S/o Sh. Puran Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 26, Gali No. 1, Nai Abadi, Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Nagar Parishad, Hanumangarh, Through Its Commissioner.

3. Dy. Director (Regional), Department Of Local Self, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

4. The Dy. Director (Admn.), Department Of Local Self, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Preet Kamal Kaur. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devam Jain for Mr. Rajesh Parihar.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order

06/02/2023

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is

squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor

v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied

on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil

Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

[2023/RJJD/004085] (2 of 2) [CW-16868/2022]

"In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner's services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order."

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to

dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is

covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by

the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions

as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 54-Sumit/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)