Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Roopa Singh S/O Shri Butta Sing vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jp:40356)
2023 Latest Caselaw 6806 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6806 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2023

Rajasthan High Court

Roopa Singh S/O Shri Butta Sing vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jp:40356) on 18 December, 2023

Author: Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench: Praveer Bhatnagar

[2023:RJ-JP:40356]

           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                       BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
                                  9131/2023

Roopa Singh S/o Shri Butta Sing, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Palla
Megha, Firozpur Sadar Police Station Firozpur District Firozpur
(Punjab) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bhawani Mandi
District Jhalawar (Raj.)
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                  ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Rohit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

                                      Order

18/12/2023

1. The instant second bail application has been filed under

Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner Roopa Singh.

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR

No.22/2020 registered at Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar

for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act.

2. The first bail application preferred by the accused-petitioner

was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 10.05.2021 with

liberty to file fresh after recording statement of investigating

officer.

3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that a

false case has been foisted against the accused-petitioner. He

further submits that other co-accused Ratan Singh was enlarged

on bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated

[2023:RJ-JP:40356] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9131/2023]

12.12.2023 and case of accused-petitioner is not different from

that of the co-accused Ratan Singh. He further submits that as per

prosecution case, contraband opium dodachura weighing 301 Kgs

and 840 Grams kept in 15 sacks, was recovered from the truck. As

per the FIR, the substance which were kept in those 15 sacks,

were got collected on a plastic cloth (Tirpal) and therefore, the

same was weighed on electronic weighing machine and samples

were drawn from the mixture, thus, the samples were not drawn

in conformity with the guidelines/instructions of Standing Order

No.1/89 issued by the NCB, New Delhi as per which, the Seizure

Officer was required to take separate sample from each sack. He

further submits that the procedure of sampling has to be done in

accordance with the directions given by Hon'ble the Apex Court in

the case of Gaunter Edwin Kircher vs State of Goa,

Secretariat Panaji, Goa (AIR 1993 SC 1456) decided on

16.03.1993 in which it was clarified that sample has to be taken

from each packet. As separate weight of all the sacks was not

known and sample from each sack was not drawn for sampling, it

cannot be said with utmost certainty that each sack was

containing dodachura and that the quantity of recovered

contraband was 301 Kgs. Similarly in the case of Netram Vs.

State of Rajasthan, reported in 2014 (1) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 163

it was also held that samples were to be drawn from each sack

and drawing sample by mixing the entire article is not as per law.

4. Accused-petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2020 and nearly

three years and nine months have been passed since his date of

arrest but still four witnesses out of the total 15 cited witnesses,

have been examined at trial. The petitioner has no criminal

[2023:RJ-JP:40356] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9131/2023]

antecedents. Trial of the case will take long spell of time and no

useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind

the bars, therefore, benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-

petitioner.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail

application on the ground that the recovered contraband comes

within the definition of commercial quantity and as per the rider

contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the bail should not be

granted.

6. Considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for

the parties and perused the material available on record. The

coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 12.12.2023 after

dealing with all the above cited judgments enlarged the similarly

situated co-accused Ratan Singh on bail, therefore, without

commenting anything on the merits/ demerits of the case, I deem

it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, this second bail application filed under Section

439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner

Roopa Singh S/o Shri Butta Sing arrested in connection with

FIR No.22/2020 registered at Police Station Mishroli, District

Jhalawar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent

sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial

Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the

dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

44-/DHARMENDRA RAKHECHA

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter