Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6724 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:39386]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13722/2020
Dr. Beena Mathur W/o Shri Brijesh Mathur, Aged About 64 Years,
R/o- A-16, Mansarovar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer- Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Management Committee, D.a.v College Managing
Committee Through Its Secretary, Mandi Market, Chitra
Gupta Marg, New Delhi-110055.
2. D.a.v. College, Ajmer, Through Principal, D.a.v College,
Beawar Road, Ajmer.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, College
Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan
4. The Director College Education, Government Of Rajasthan
Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n Marg, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajat Choudhary &
Mr. Himanshu Kala for
Mr. Ajatshatru Mina
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Naina Saraf
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
13/12/2023
1. Counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that the
issue involved in the present writ petition has already been put to
rest by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No. 2655/2021; Dr. Deepak T. Bijlani Vs. The
Management Committee D.A.V. College and Ors. with other
connected petitions, decided on 12.05.2023.
2. Counsel appearing for the respondent does not dispute the
fact as stated by counsel for the petitioner.
3. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Dr. Deepak
T. Bijlani (supra) has observed as under:-
[2023:RJ-JP:39386] (2 of 2) [CW-13722/2020]
"8. It appears that petitioners were satisfied with the aforesaid order dated 21.08.2019 and they were sleeping till the year 2021 and all of sudden they woke up after a lapse of more than five years from the date of passing of the judgment dated 24.10.2016 by the Tribunal and approached this Court concealing all these material facts with the prayer to issue directions to the respondents to make the payment of interest @ 10% per annum as per Section 7 of the Act of 1972.
9. The law is well settled in this regard that the platform of the Court cannot be used or utilized in a leisure form. If at all the petitioners were aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 24.10.2016, they could have assailed the said judgment immediately, but they kept silence for almost about five years and now without giving any explanation of the inordinate delay of five years and without disclosing the material facts, they have approached this Court. The petitioners have not approached this Court with clean hands and they are estopped by their statements made in writ petition No. 8592/2019.
10. In view of the discussions made hereinabove, all writ petitions stand dismissed."
4. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the parties
and the observations made by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court
in case of Dr. Deepak T. Bijlani (supra) the present petition is also
dismissed having no merit.
5. Since the main petition has been dismissed, the stay
application and all pending application/s, if any, also stand
dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /78
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!