Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10842 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:44241]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19092/2023
Rajendra Singh Rajpurohit S/o Late Shri Bhanwar Singh
Rajpurohit, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of 2Nd D 80, J.n.
Vyas Colony, Bikaner (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary,
Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Government Of Rajasthan,
Police Headquarter, Jaipur
3. The Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners
Welfare Department, Jaipur.
4. The Superintendent Of Police Cid, Cb Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akhilesh Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Vyas, AAG
Mr. Ravi Panwar, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
18/12/2023
Issue notice to the respondents.
Shri Manish Vyas, learned Additional Advocate General and
Shri Ravi Panwar, learned Govt. counsel are directed to accept
notice on behalf of the respondents. Service upon respondents is,
therefore, complete.
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved
against the order of recovery dated 11.12.2017 (Annex.-1)
passed by the respondents seeking refund of the amount of
Rs.1,48,218/- alongwith interest and for seeking re-fixation.
[2023:RJ-JD:44241] (2 of 3) [CW-19092/2023]
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press for re-
fixation and submits that the rest of the issue raised in the
present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this
Court in Hari Lal Veragi vs. Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam
Limited & Ors. :S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1864/2015,
decided on 18.05.2015 and Ramesh Chandra Joshi vs. Ajmer
Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.7645/2012, decided on 02.08.2016, wherein this Court
relying on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer):
(2014) 8 SCC 883 has directed as under:-
"Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in the following terms:-
The impugned order (Annexure-2) dated
30.04.2012 whereby, the respondents effected the
recovery of Rs.2,29,891/- from the petitioner's terminal benefits is hereby quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to reimburse the said amount to the petitioner with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of recovery till the date of actual payment. For future payments accruing to the petitioner towards pension, the respondents, if so advised, shall be entitled to revise the same after making refixation as per the record in case rules so permit. No order as to costs."
3. Learned counsel for the respondents are not in a position to
controvert the said aspect.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition filed by the
petitioner to the extent pressed is also allowed.
5. The order dated 11.12.2017 (Annex.1) is quashed and set
aside. The amount of Rs.1,48,218/- recovered from the petitioner
[2023:RJ-JD:44241] (3 of 3) [CW-19092/2023]
be refunded back alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the
date of recovery till the date of actual payment.
6. The needful may be done by the respondents within a period
of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is
placed before the respondents.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 36-Ravi Khandelwal
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!