Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10802 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:43932-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 304/2018
Sudhir Sharda S/o Shri Premchand Sharda, Resident Of Prem
Villa, Ganesh Gali, Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri Manjit Singh, Principal Secretary, Department Of
Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Shri Sudarshan Sethi, Additional Chief Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj,
Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Department
Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Panchayati Raj,
Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Local Self Government, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Bohra
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Beniwal, AAG assisted by
Mr. Utkarsh Singh
Mr. Sudhir Tak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Judgment / Order
15/12/2023
This contempt petition is filed by the petitioner while stating
that this Court vide order dated 18.04.2017 has disposed of D.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.9602/2016 filed by the petitioner in view of
the fact that the State Government has already circulated a policy
for advertisement by Local Bodies on 13.02.2017 and 14.12.2016
and issued a direction to the State Government to get the policy
[2023:RJ-JD:43932-DB] (2 of 3) [WCP-304/2018]
declared under the circular dated 13.02.2017 implemented
strictly.
It is submitted that despite declaration of the policy by the
State Government and directions given by this Court to implement
the said policy strictly, the Local Bodies are getting the
advertisements published in the newspapers in violation of the
aforesaid policy.
Along with the contempt petition, several documents have
been annexed by the petitioner to fortify his claim that the Local
Bodies are not strictly implementing the policy of the State
Government.
Reply to the contempt petition and compliance reports have
been filed on behalf of the respondents from time to time, wherein
it is clarified that the respondents took strict action against the
erring officials of the Local Bodies under the provisions of relevant
disciplinary Rules and disciplinary proceedings were also initiated
against those erring officials and the same are pending against
them. Learned AAG has assured this Court that the proceedings
initiated against the erring officials will be concluded expeditiously.
It is also informed that in some of the cases of the
cooperative societies, recovery notices have already been issued
to the erring office bearers/officials.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going
through the material available on record, we are of the view that
the respondents are taking action against the erring office
bearers/officials of the Local Bodies, who have violated the policy
of the State Government and in such circumstances, no further
[2023:RJ-JD:43932-DB] (3 of 3) [WCP-304/2018]
order is required to be passed in this writ contempt petition by
this Court.
Hence, this writ contempt petition is dismissed.
However, it will be open for the petitioner to file a fresh
contempt petition as and when occasion arises.
Notices are discharged.
(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J
36-mSingh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!