Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Usha Devi vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:43401)
2023 Latest Caselaw 10665 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10665 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Smt. Usha Devi vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:43401) on 13 December, 2023

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

[2023:RJ-JD:43401]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18925/2023

Smt. Usha Devi W/o Shri Gyan Singh, Aged About 36 Years, By
Caste Rajput, R/o Binega, Tehsil And District Karauli. Presently
Working As Cook In Govt. Devnarayan Grils Hostel Karauli.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social Welfare
         Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Director, Social Welfare Department, Jaipur.
3.       The    Assistant       Director,    Social      Welfare    Department,
         Karauli.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)           :     Mr. Mahipal Rajpurohit.
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Anil Kumar Gaur, AAG.



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

13/12/2023

1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the

controversy involved in this petition is covered by the order dated

16.11.2023 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Smt.

Soram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.1335/2022). The order dated 16.11.2023 reads as follows:-

"Learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is covered by the order dated 01.12.2022 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3595/2022 (Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.).

The operative paras of the order dated 01.12.2022 is reproduced herein below for ready reference:-

"A specific determination was made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court holding that the said

[2023:RJ-JD:43401] (2 of 3) [CW-18925/2023]

requirement was a result of intermingled legal position determined by the Supreme Court on the subject of regularization of employees while the issue before the Court was pay parity and that the determination was in teeth of the judgment in Daily Rated Casual Labour vs. Union of India : (1988) 1 SCC 122.

In view of the above categorical pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the aspect of period for which the petitioners are required to work for the purpose of getting minimum of the pay scale, the determination made by the respondents requiring the petitioners to have worked for a minimum of 10 years cannot be sustained.

In all the cases, on other aspects i.e. the minimum qualification and satisfactory working of the petitioners, the authority has held in favour of the petitioners. In view of the above discussion, the petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed. The orders dated 10/9/2021 (Annex.P/2 in CW No. 3595/22), 10/9/2021 (Annex.P/2 in CW No.17734/21), 4/2/2022 (Annex.P/3 in CW No. 4201/2022), 4/2/2022 (Annex.P/2 in CW No. 4244/2022), 10/9/2021 (Annex.3 in CW No.4822/2022) and 16/11/2021 (Annex.P./2 in CW No.1304/2022) denying minimum of the pay scale to the petitioners only on account of their having worked for less than 10 years are quashed and set aside.

The respondents are directed to accord the benefit of minimum of the pay scale to the petitioners from the date their writ petitions filed in earlier round of litigation came to be decided by this Court, as indicated hereinbefore.

Needful be done by the respondents within a period of four weeks from the date of this order"

In view of aforesaid, the present writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed. The order dated 08.10.2021 (Annexure-P/2) denying minimum of the pay-scale to the petitioner on account of her not having completed the services of ten years, is quashed and set aside.

The respondents are directed to accord the benefit of minimum pay-scale to the petitioner from the date of her filing the earlier writ petition.

[2023:RJ-JD:43401] (3 of 3) [CW-18925/2023]

Needful be done by the respondents within a period of four weeks from the date of this order."

2. In light of the aforequoted order, the present writ petition is

also allowed on the same terms. All pending applications stand

disposed of.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

45-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter