Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10610 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:43361]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2070/2023
1. Jyoti W/o Shri Naresh Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, D/o
Shri Pala Ram Bhambhu, R/o Ward No. 10, Nagrana,
Tehsil Sangaria 2 Mmk, Dist. Hanumangarh.
2. Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Meharchand, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Ramsara Narayan, 20 Mh, Dist.
Hanumangarh.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh.
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Sangaria, Dist.
Hanumangarh.
4. Palaram S/o Shri Chuni Ram, R/o Nagrana Dhani, Chak 2
Mmk, P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
5. Vimla Devi W/o Palaram, R/o Nagrana Dhani, Chak 2
Mmk, P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
6. Krishan Bhambhu S/o Palaram, R/o Nagrana Dhani, Chak
2 Mmk, P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
7. Mahaveer Bhambhu S/o Chuni Ram, R/o Nagrana Dhani,
Chak 2 Mmk, P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
8. Vikash Bhambhu S/o Mahaveer, R/o Nagrana Dhani, Chak
2 Mmk, P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
9. Amarchand Bhambhu S/o Chuni Ram, R/o Nagrana Dhani,
Chak 2 Mmk, P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
10. Kamlesh Bhambhu S/o Amarchand, R/o Nagrana Dhani,
Chak 2 Mmk, P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
11. Jagdish S/o Chuni Ram, R/o Nagrana Dhani, Chak 2 Mmk,
P.s. Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
12. Pawan S/o Jagdish, R/o Nagrana Dhani, Chak 2 Mmk, P.s.
Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh.
13. Sandeep Bana S/o Hari Ram Bana, R/o 19 Ssw, Pilibanga,
Dist. Hanumangarh.
14. Dalip Beniwal S/o Puran Ram, R/o 19 Ssw, Pilibanga, Dist.
Hanumangarh.
(Downloaded on 12/12/2023 at 08:44:46 PM)
[2023:RJ-JD:43361] (2 of 3) [CRLW-2070/2023]
15. Netram Godara S/o Khayali Ram, R/o Indrapura, Dist.
Hanumangarh.
16. Senprakash S/o Khayali Ram, R/o Indrapura, Dist.
Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
12/12/2023 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the
Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh with a prayer to be
provided with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to
their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners
[2023:RJ-JD:43361] (3 of 3) [CRLW-2070/2023]
for directing the S.P., Hanumangarh to provide protection to the
petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh shall have the
matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection
shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The
S.P. Hanumangarh shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR), J.
539-AbhishekK/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!