Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10272 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:41606]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4650/2023
Arun S/o Roshan Lal, Aged About 34 Years, B/c Soni R/o Ward
No. 19 Anoopgarh Ps Anoopgarh Dist. Sri Ganganagar
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Special PP CBN
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RS Gill
For Respondent(s) : Mr. KS Nahar, Spl.P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
01/12/2023
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, challenge
has been made to the order dated 08.05.2023 passed by the
learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, No.2, District Chittorgarh
in Criminal Misc. Case No.72/2023 pertaining to FIR No. 03/2016
registered at Police Station CBN Chittorgarh whereby the prayer
made by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle in question
(Maruti Swift Dzire Car) bearing registration No. RJ-13-CB-2697
has been declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the
owner of the vehicle in question which has been seized by the
Police Officers. He further submits that the petitioner being the
owner of the vehicle in question, is the person best entitled to get
back the possession of the seized property. There is no other
person claiming supurdagi of the same.
[2023:RJ-JD:41606] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4650/2023]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the instant criminal misc.
petition.
4. Considering the submissions and following the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order dated 18.11.2022 passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 2005/2022 [SLP
(Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala
& Anr., wherein, the vehicle involved in a crime under NDPS Act
was directed to be released on terms and conditions to be
determined by the Special Court, the misc. petition is allowed and
this Court deems it just and appropriate to release the vehicle in
question in favour of the petitioner on interim custody till
conclusion of the trial provided he furnishes a Supurdaginama of
Rs. 3,00,000/- and surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the
Court below.
5. This order shall not be operational if the final order of
confiscation has been passed.
(FARJAND ALI),J 322-pramod/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!