Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5776 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9360/2023
1. Khet Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 50 Years,
Khara, Nokh P.s., Dist. Jaisalmer. (Confined In Sub Jail,
Pokaran)
2. Abhay Singh @ Abhu S/o Amar Singh, Aged About 45
Years, Khara, Nokh P.s., Dist. Jaisalmer. (Confined In Sub
Jail, Pokaran)
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Shiv Singh.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
ORDER
10/08/2023
This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been
filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with
FIR No.20/2023 registered at Police Station Nokh, District
Jaisalmer, for offence under Section 306 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as per
prosecution, deceased Kushal Singh committed suicide in front of
Police Station Nokh. Learned counsel submitted that the deceased
committed suicide due to harassment caused to him by the
present petitioners as by their various misdeeds, they were
causing him financial losses.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there is no
evidence to show the involvement of the petitioners for causing
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-9360/2023]
abetment to the deceased to commit suicide. Learned counsel
submitted that that allegation of harassment and causing
harassment has been levelled against the petitioners only with a
view to implicate them in the present case.
Learned counsel relied upon the judgment rendered by
Hon'ble the Apex court in M. Arjuna vs. State, represented by
its Inspector of Police, reported in (2019) 3 SCC 315, wherein
the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under:-
"The essential ingredients of the offence under Section 306 I.P.C. are: (i) the abetment, (ii) the intention of the accused to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide. The act of the accused, however, insulting the deceased by using abusive language will not, by itself, constitute the abetment of suicide. There should be evidence capable of suggesting that the accused intended by such act to instigate the deceased to commit suicide. Unless the ingredients of instigation/abetment to commit suicide are satisfied, accused cannot be convicted under Section 306 I.P.C."
Learned counsel further also relied upon the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of S.S.
Cheena Vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan & Anr. reported in
(2010)12 SCC 190, wherein Hon'ble the Supreme Court while
deciding a criminal appeal held that abetment involves a mental
process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding a person in
doing of a thing. Without a positive act on the part of the accused
to instigate or aid in committing suicide, conviction cannot be
sustained.
Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are in judicial
custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time,
therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-
petitioners.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9360/2023]
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail
application.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of the case so also the fact that there is no
evidence available on record showing that the petitioners are
guilty of the act of instigating/abetting the deceased to commit
suicide, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the
case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners- (i) Khet
Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh and (ii) Abhay Singh @ Abhu S/o
Amar Singh shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR
No.20/2023 registered at Police Station Nokh, District Jaisalmer,
provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before
the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called
upon to do so.
It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations
made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail
application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 208-TarunGoyal/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!