Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bagda Ram vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 5509 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5509 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Bagda Ram vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 2 August, 2023
Bench: Augustine George Masih, Vinit Kumar Mathur

[2023:RJ-JD:24530-DB] (1 of 3) [SOSA-896/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Criminal Misc 3rd Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 896/2023

Bagda Ram S/o Sh. Narisingh Ram, Aged About 46 Years, B/c Bheel, R/o Bheelo Ki Dhani, Khutani, P.S. Rohat, Dist. Pali. (Presently Lodged at Central Jail, Jodhpur).

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, PP

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

02/08/2023

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for

suspension of sentence.

The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

preferred by the appellant-applicant, who has been convicted and

sentenced by the learned trial court vide judgment dated

13.03.2018 in Sessions Case No.158/2015. The appellant-

applicant has been sentenced as under :-


Offence U/s Sentence                           Fine                 Sentence in default
                                                                    of payment of fine
302/34 IPC Life Imprisonment                   Rs.10,000/ 6 months' additional
                                               -                    imprisonment
323/34 IPC 6 Months'                           -                    -
               imprisonment




 [2023:RJ-JD:24530-DB]                   (2 of 3)                         [SOSA-896/2023]




It is the contention of the learned cousnel for the applicant-

appellant- Bagda Ram that the co-accused namely Varda Ram has

already been granted the benefit of suspension of sentence by a

Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.07.2023, where

the allegations against the three accused namely Varda Ram,

Bagda Ram and Prakashi Devi are identical. No distinct specific

role has been attributed to any of the three accused.

The period of custody of Bagda Ram is identical to that of

Varda Ram and, therefore, the applicant-appellant may also be

granted the benefit of suspension of sentence during pendency of

the appeal.

Learned cousnel for the State is unable to distinguish the

case of the applicant-appellant from that of the co-accused as has

been pointed out by the counsel for the applicant-appellant.

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances

of the case and without making any observation on the merits of

the case, we are inclined to suspend the sentence awarded to the

appellant-applicant.

Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence filed

under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

substantive sentence passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Pali vide

judgment dated 13.03.2018 in Sessions Case No.158/2015

against appellant-applicant Bagda Ram S/o Shri Narsingh Ram

shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal, provided

he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with

two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned

trial judge for his appearance in this court on 04.09.2023 and

[2023:RJ-JD:24530-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-896/2023]

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the

month of January of every year till the appeal is

decided.

2. That if the appellant changes the place of residence,

he will give in writing his changed address to the trial

Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they

will give in writing their changed address to the trial

Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ

21-SanjayS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter