Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4050 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:18689-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 674/2023
Swati Sharma D/o Sh. Navneet Sharma, Aged About 36 Years,
R/o Flat No. 8, Plot No. F-49, Laxmi Apartment, Saraswati Nagar,
Behind Ehcc, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur-302017 Presently Working As
Junior Commercial Tax Officer, Circle M, Jaipur 1St, Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
1. Ram Avtar Sharma S/o Shri Narayan Lal, Aged About 52
Years, R/o D.n. 7A, Vikas Nagar, Dadi Ka Phatak,
Murlipura, Jaipur-302017
2. Narendra Parihar S/o Sh. Himmat Ram Parihar, Aged
About 47 Years, R/o J-22-A, Sharma Colony, 22 Godam,
Jaipur
3. Thakur Das Mahawar S/o Late Sh. Chandula Mahawar,
Aged About 41 Years, R/o 14, Ganpati Vihar, Panchvati
Colony, Khatipura Road, Jaipur
4. Manish Sokal S/o Sh. Ramswaroop Kumawat, Aged About
43 Years, R/o Near Police Memorial, Chaat House Lane,
Kanota Baag, Near Fatehpuria Jewellers, Jaipur
5. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Rajasthan,
Jaipur
6. Joint Secretary, Finance (Tax) Department, Rajasthan,
Jaipur
7. Sh. Susheel Kumar Gupta, Junior Commercial Tax Officer,
Lising Tax-2, Divisional Kar Bhawan, Jhalana, Jaipur.
8. Ishwar Kanwar, Junior Commercial Tax Officer,
Headquarter, Kar Bhawan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shobit Tiwari
Mr. Akshit Gupta on behalf of
Mr. Vigyan Shah
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
[2023:RJ-JP:18689-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-674/2023]
Order
23/08/2023 (ORAL)
1. The present appeal is preferred against the interim order
dated 03.08.2023 passed by learned Single Judge, whereby while
admitting the writ petition, the operation of the impugned
judgment passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate
Tribunal dated 07.06.2023 has been ordered to be stayed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant very fairly states that it is
only an interim order but certain observations have been made in
the impugned order which may ultimately prejudice their claim
and their rights while deciding the case on merits.
3. We have considered the observations, as have been made by
the learned Single Judge in the impugned order and are of the
view that they were only for the purposes of deciding the issue
with regard to the prayer for staying the operation of the
judgment which was impugned therein. In any case, it is clarified
that the observations, if any, made by the learned Single Judge
vide order dated 03.08.2023 would not prejudice the rights of any
of the parties i.e. the appellants as well as the respondents.
4. The appeal stands disposed of with above observations.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ
KAMLESH KUMAR/RAJAT/34-D
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!