Raj Kumar @ Yuvraj S/O Kailash ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 3653 Raj/2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
            BENCH AT JAIPUR

      S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.
                           5090/2023

Raj Kumar @ Yuvraj S/o Kailash Raiger, Aged About
34 Years, Resident Of Kundanpura @ Jaipura, Tehsil
Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj).
                                                        ----Petitioner
                               Versus
1.    State       Of       Rajasthan,           Through           Public
      Prosecutor,        Rajasthan          High        Court   Jaipur
      Bench, Jaipur.
2.    Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police,
      Hq, Jaipur (Raj).
3.    Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (Raj).
4.    Sho Police Station Ramnagariya, Jaipur (Raj).
                                                  ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.D. Khandelwal, Adv.

For                     : Mr. Prashant Sharma, P.P.
Respondent(s)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

17/08/2023

The petitioner-complainant has preferred this

criminal miscellaneous petition seeking fair

investigation.

A complaint has been filed by the complainant

before the concerned Judicial Magistrate which was

forwarded under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to the

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5090/2023]

concerned police station whereupon the present FIR

came to be registered.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as

learned Public Prosecutor.

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu

Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., AIR 2008 SC Page 907

has held that the Magistrate has very wide powers to

direct registration of an FIR and to ensure a proper

investigation and for this purpose, he can monitor

the investigation to ensure that the investigation is

done properly. The High Court should discourage the

practice of filing a writ petition or petition under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. simply because a person has a

grievance that after registration of FIR, proper

investigation has not been done by the police.

In view of above, this Court is not inclined to

entertain the criminal miscellaneous petition. The

same is accordingly dismissed.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to

approach the concerned Magistrate for redressing his

grievance.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

DANISH USMANI /867

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)