Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3125 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2023
[2023/RJJD/010187]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 543/2020
Gunjan Joshi D/o Narendra Joshi, Aged About 29 Years, A-34, Mahi Sarovar Nagar, Banswara, District Banswara, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Raj., Through The Secretary, Department Of Information Technology And Communication, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Chairman, Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohan Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Krishan Singh Bha
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
17/04/2023
1. The petitioner had approached this Court with a grievance
that her candidature has been rejected on the ground that she
had produced her domicile certificate issued in the State of
Madhya Pradesh.
2. Considering petitioner's contention that the petitioner is a
women married to a TSP candidate and her case is covered by the
judgment of Twarita Gehlot Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in
S.B.C.W.P. No.15540/2017 decided on 14.12.2017, an interim
order was passed on 20.01.2020 in petitioner's favour.
3. Mr. Manvendra Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the respondent- Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service
[2023/RJJD/010187] (2 of 2) [CW-543/2020]
Selection Board at the outset submitted that petitioner's
candidature had been rejected on two counts- (i) that she did not
have bona-fide domicile certificate from TSP area of Rajasthan and
(ii) the certificate which she had produced for considering her
candidature under sports category does not conform to the
condition of the advertisement.
4. He submitted that the second ground of rejection is duly
reflected in the table given at page No.70 so also reply filed by the
respondents.
5. It was also submitted that petitioner has failed to secure
marks equal or more than the cut off of her category (General
Female TSP).
6. In view of the specific stand taken by the respondents, even
if petitioner's first ground of rejection is set aside, her candidature
under the sports category has to be rejected as she has not
secured 1st position in any State Level tournament. That apart,
considering that the petitioner has failed to secure marks more
than the cut off of her category, there is no merit and substance in
the present petition.
7. The present writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.
8. The interim order passed on 20.01.2020 is hereby vacated.
9. The stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 43-pooja/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!