Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mukesh Kumar vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 13 April, 2023
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2023/RJJD/009926]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 563/2023
1. Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Tana Ram, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o V-1 Tkwa, Tehsil - Pilibangan, District - Hanumangarh
(Raj.).
2. Shishpal S/o Shri Ashok Kumar, Aged About 39 Years, R/o
V-1 Dbn-A, Teshil - Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
3. Naveen Kumar S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Ward No. 18, Purana Railway Station,
Suratgarh District - Sri Ganganagar.
4. Arur Singh S/o Shri Kaka Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/
o Ward No. 9, Sadakwala, Tehsil - Suratgarh District Sri
Ganganagar.
5. Sohan Singh S/o Shri Darshan Singh, Aged About 34
Years, R/o V.p.o. Nirwana, Tehsil Suratgarh District Sri
Ganganagar.
6. Om Prakash Mahar S/o Shri Rampratap Mahar, Aged
About 40 Years, R/o V.p.o Birmana, Teshil - Suratgarh,
District Sri Ganganagar.
7. Shankar Lal S/o Shri Mana Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/
o V- Hinjrasar, P.o. Govindsar, Tehsil - Suratgarh, District
Sri Ganganagar.
8. Kishan Singh S/o Shri Kulwant Singh, Aged About 36
Years, R/o Chak 24 A.s.b. V.p.o. Satrana Tehsil Gharsana
District Sri Ganganagar.
9. Raisahab Kumar S/o Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 34
Years, R/o 60-A, Saraswati Nagar, Ward No. 41, Chahal
Chok Sri Ganganagar.
10. Ghanshyam Lal S/o Shri Ratan Lal Sharma, Aged About
35 Years, R/o Nehra Nagar, District - Sri Ganganagar.
11. Ranjeet Singh S/o Shri Mahender Singh, Aged About 40
Years, R/o E-3 Vaishali Nagar, Sri Ganganagar.
12. Gursewak Singh S/o Shri Buta Singh, Aged About 39
Years, R/o V-29 H, Tehsil Karanpur, Sri Ganganagar.
13. Anil Kumar S/o Shri Surender Singh, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Karanpur, District - Sri Ganganagar.
14. Kuldeep Kaur W/o Shri Ratan Singh, Aged About 37
Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Anupgarh, Sri Ganganagar.
15. Jitender Kumar S/o Shri Ram Chander, Aged About 39
Years, R/o Ward No. 9, Kachi Thadi, Sri Karanpur, District
Sri Ganganagar.
16. Sonu Rani W/o Shri Rajkumar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Ward No. 10, Shyam Nagar, Sri Ganganagar.
17. Krishan Lal S/o Shri Rampratap, Aged About 38 Years, R/
o Ward No. 11, Chak 22 Ass-B 6, Gharsana, Sri
Ganganagar.
18. Shri Bhagwan S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 34 Years,
[2023/RJJD/009926] (2 of 4) [CW-563/2023]
R/o V.p.o. Govindpura 18 Jj, Sri Ganganagar.
19. Ramchander S/o Shri Jagdish Chander, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Chak 30 As-Bt, Rawala, Sri Ganganagar.
20. Narayan Dutt S/o Shri Khyali Ram, Aged About 44 Years,
R/o Chak 9 Asa V.p.o. 5 As, Motasar Sri Vijaynagar, Sri
Ganganagar.
21. Kuldeep Gaur S/o Shri Mahveer Prasad Sharma, Aged
About 45 Years, R/o Adarsh Chlk Ke Pass, Ramdev Mandir
Road, Anupgarh Sri Ganganagar.
22. Balkar Singh S/o Shri Pal Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/
o Ward No. 9, Mehtab Colony New Mandi Gharsana, Sri
Ganganagar.
23. Hansraj S/o Shri Sahi Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o
Chak 2 Gdb, New Mandi Gharsana, Sri Ganganagar.
24. Jasveer Kumar S/o Shri Milkhi Ram, Aged About 36 Years,
R/o Chak 6 H, Patoada, Anupgarh, Sri Ganganagar.
25. Mamkori W/o Shri Rampratap, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Ward No. 2, 35 Tr New Gharsana, Sri Ganganagar.
26. Surender Kumar S/o Shri Manphool Ram, Aged About 42
Years, R/o 4 K-2 Rawala, Sri Ganganagar.
27. Narender Kumar S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 37
Years, R/o V.p.o. 9 Md, New Gharsana, Sri Ganganagar.
28. Subash Chander S/o Shri Gopi Ram, Aged About 40
Years, R/o Ward No. 27, Anupgarh, Sri Ganganagar.
29. Kalu Singh Rathore S/o Shri Kishan Singh Rathore, Aged
About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Ns School Ke Pass,
Anupgarh, Sri Ganganagar.
30. Satpal S/o Shri Premraj, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Chak
9 Dol-A, Tehsil - Rawala, Gharsana, Sri Ganganagar.
31. Kuldeep Kumar Mudgal S/o Shri Surajbhan Sharma, Aged
About 49 Years, R/o 165 Hardeep Singh Colony Ward No.
30, Sri Ganganagar.
32. Karamjeet Singh S/o Shri Sadhu Singh, Aged About 43
Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Sadulsahar, District - Sri
Ganganagar.
33. Devender Singh S/o Shri Hakam Singh, Aged About 37
Years, R/o 29 G.d. Tehsil - Sri Vijaynagar, Sri Ganganagar.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj,
Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Additional Commissioner, Egc (II), Rural Development
And Panchayati Raj Department (Section-3, Mgnrega),
Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The District Project Coordinator (Mgnrega) Cum District
[2023/RJJD/009926] (3 of 4) [CW-563/2023]
Collector, District - Sri Ganganagar.
4. The Additional District Project Co-Coordinator (Mgnrega)
Cum Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Sri
Ganganagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
5. The Programme Officer Cum Vikas Adhikari (Mgnrega),
Panchayat Samiti Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
6. The Programme Officer Cum Vikas Adhikari (Mgnrega),
Panchayat Samiti Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar.
7. The Programme Officer Cum Vikas Adhikari (Mgnrega),
Panchayat Samiti Sri Ganganagar, District Sri
Ganganagar.
8. The Programme Officer Cum Vikas Adhikari (Mgnrega),
Panchayat Samiti Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar.
9. The Programme Officer Cum Vikas Adhikari (Mgnrega),
Panchayat Samiti Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
10. The Programme Officer Cum Vikas Adhikari (Mgnrega),
Panchayat Samiti Sri Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
11. The Programme Officer Cum Vikas Adhikari (Mgnrega),
Panchayat Samiti Sadulsahar, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Bhaleria
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Tak
Mr. Rajdeep Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
13/04/2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties submits that the controversy
involved in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment of
this Court rendered in a bunch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.6338/2022 (Hari Singh & Ors. Vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors.), and other connected matters decided on
14.09.2022 in the following terms:-
"From the above, it is apparent that similarly placed
man with machine at Zila Parishad, Udaipur are being
paid the enhanced amount whereby for the period
[2023/RJJD/009926] (4 of 4) [CW-563/2023]
2009 to 2014 an increment of 10% and for the period
2014 onwards, an increment of 5% has been granted
and they have also been paid the arrear.
No reasons has been indicated for distinguishing
the case of the petitioners from those working with the
Zila Parishad, Udaipur. As the petitioners are similarly
placed and also governed by the directions issued in
this regard, they are also entitled to similar relief as
granted by the Zila Parishad, Udaipur.
Consequently, these petitions filed by the
petitioners are allowed, the respondents are directed to
do the needful in terms of the directions as given in the
case of Zila Parishad, Udaipur quoted hereinbefore.
While making payment of arrears, the
respondents would take into consideration the
enhanced amount being paid to the petitioners for all
this period. Needful may be done by the respondents
within a period of eight weeks."
For the self same reasons, the present writ petition is also
allowed in terms of the judgment passed by this Court on
14.09.2022 in the case of Hari Singh (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
42-Shahenshah/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
