Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6448 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14339/2022
Raghav Enterprises
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer & Anr.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi Advocate assisted by Mr. N.S. Bhati Advocate.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Judgment / Order
29/09/2022
Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate enters appearance & takes
notice on behalf of the respondents.
In addition, a copy of petition along with annexures be
supplied to learned counsel for the respondents today itself and
reply be filed within two weeks.
List this case after two weeks along with D.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.12281/2022.
In the meantime, taking into consideration the submissions
made by learned counsel for the petitioner that even before the
amendment with effect from 01.04.2021, the proceedings under
Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 could not have been issued
in view of the provision as it stood prior to amendment as barred
under Clause (b) of Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
further proceedings shall remain stayed.
(2 of 2) [CW-14339/2022]
Learned counsel for the respondents is at liberty to move
application under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India for
vacating stay order.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Sanjay Kumawat-18
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!