Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Angrej Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 11112 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11112 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Angrej Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 September, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                  S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 706/2022

Angrej Singh S/o Sh. Banshi Lal, Aged About 26 Years,
Bharwana Police Station Gogamedi Dist. Hanumangarh. (At
Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Hanumangarh).
                                                                        ----Appellant
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Vikas Bijarnia.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

06/09/2022

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of

respondent-State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.436/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no

brutality in the allegations made. Learned counsel further submits

that the statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. rendered by the

prosecutrix does not make any allegations against the present

appellant.     Learned   counsel       also     submits          that   the   age   of

prosecutrix was 17 years, 10 months and 9 days old on the date

of incident.

     Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the

consensual issue has been converted into the prosecution case.



                     (Downloaded on 06/09/2022 at 10:28:45 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                       [CRLAS-706/2022]


Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that the appellant

was on bail during trial.

     Learned      Public   Prosecutor         opposes         the      suspension     of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

436/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 05.05.2022 in Session Case No.27/2019

against appellant- Angrej Singh S/o Sh. Banshi Lal shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal,

provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned   trial   Judge     for    his    appearance              in   this   Court   on

11.10.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of

the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellant changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing his changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall



                      (Downloaded on 06/09/2022 at 10:28:45 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-706/2022]



                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

14-/Jitender/Nirmala

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter