Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6554 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 11 October, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2339/2010
1. Babulal Depan Son Of Shri Bhanwar Lal, House No. 2,
Rammolla Road, Outside Nagori Gate, Jodhpur.
2. Rattiram Meena Son Of Shri Kishori Lal Meena, VPO
Singhana, District Jhunjhunu
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Chief Secretary,
Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Principal Secretary, Technical Education Department,
Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
3. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Rajasthan,
Government Secretariat, Jaipur
4. Director, Technical Education Department, Rajasthan,
Jodhpur
5. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Rajasthan, Ajmer
Through Its Secretary
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Bansal with Mr. Pawan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hari Kishan Saini, Dy.G.C.
Mr. Manoj Pareek
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
11/10/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the
prayer with regard to validity of Rule 42 of the Rajasthan Technical
Education (Engineering) Rules, 2010.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue
involved in this writ petition has been considered and decided on
(D.B. SAW/2607/2011 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(2 of 2) [CW-2339/2010]
31.05.2018 by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat
Jodhpur in the case of Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal and Ors. Vs.
State of Rajasthan and Ors. wherein it has been held as
under:-
"The upshot of the above discussion is that the writ petition filed by the petitioners deserves to be allowed, accordingly, the same is allowed. The retrospectivity given to the Rules of 2010 with effect from 01.09.1996 is hereby declared illegal, unconstitutional and accordingly the same hereby struck down and the respondent State is directed to make applicable Rules prospectively i.e. from the date of enactment. However, it is clarified that the vacancies which arise after 2010, shall be filled in, in accordance with Rules of 2010 and all those unfilled vacancies of Head of Department and Principal till 08.01.2010, shall be filled in, in accordance with Rules of 1973. The respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioners for promotion on the post of Principal/Joint Director against the vacancies, which remained unfilled, till January, 2010 and the said exercise may be made within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. No costs."
Learned counsel for the respondents have not disputed the
submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of in
view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court at
Principal Seat Jodhpur in the case of Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal
(supra). Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
RAJAT KUMAR /70
(D.B. SAW/2607/2011 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!