Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anwar Husain vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 12312 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12312 Raj
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Anwar Husain vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 October, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
   S.B. Criminal Misc IIIrd Suspension Of Sentence Application
                       (Appeal) No. 810/2022

Anwar Husain S/o Shri Babu Shah, Aged About 33 Years, B/c
Muslim, R/o Mandawar Near Mosque, P.s. Taal, District Ratlam,
M.p. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati.
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

14/10/2022

     Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this

Court towards the statement of PW-6 i.e. Chunni Lal, who was the

owner of Jaideep Hotel where the appellant stayed with the

prosecutrix as husband and wife.

     Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the

allegations are there but there are some kind of consent in the

matter. Learned counsel further submits that the appellant has

already undergone a custody of five years and six days as on

12.10.2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellant makes a statement at Bar

that there are no previous criminal antecedents against the

present appellant. The reason given by the learned counsel for the

appellant for the third suspension of sentence application is that

the appellant has undergone more than half of the sentence.


                    (Downloaded on 14/10/2022 at 09:27:30 PM)
                                             (2 of 3)                      [SOSA-810/2022]



     Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case and on conjoint consideration of the submissions made

by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Court considers it

just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to

the accused applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, the present suspension of sentence application

filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide judgment

dated     28.11.2019       in    Sessions         Case      No.125/2018           against

applicant-appellant Anwar Husain S/o Shri Babu Shah Lal shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal,

provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 16.11.2022

and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on

the conditions indicated below:-
     1.     That he will appear before the trial Court in the

            month of January of every year till the appeal is

            decided.


     2.     That   if    the     appellant        changes           the   place   of

            residence, he will give in writing his changed

            address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

            in the High Court.


     3.     Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

            they will give in writing their changed address to

            the trial Court.




                        (Downloaded on 14/10/2022 at 09:27:30 PM)
                                                                                (3 of 3)                [SOSA-810/2022]



                                         The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.



                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

167-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter