Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh vs State
2022 Latest Caselaw 13203 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13203 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Suresh vs State on 9 November, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                              No. 574/2020

                                       IN

                S.B. Criminal Appeal No.144/2020

Suresh S/o Sh. Gopal Lal, Aged About 23 Years, B/c Balai R/o
Bhatedha Ps Banera District Bhilwara. (Presently Lodged In
Central Jail, Ajmer).
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. RS Gill
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Arun Kumar, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

09/11/2022
     Admit.

     Record has already been received.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application

seeking suspension of sentence no.574/2020.

     Counsel for the appellant submits that almost consent is

recorded, though, allegations are also there.

     Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has

undergone custody of about six years, out of total 14 years RI

sentence awarded to the accused.

     Counsel for the appellant submits that one age of the

prosecutrix is 01.1.2000.



                    (Downloaded on 10/11/2022 at 08:48:31 PM)
                                         (2 of 3)                [SOSA-574/2020]


     Counsel for the appellant submits the prosecutrix and the

accused-appellant from Bhilwara after taking private bus went to

Ahmedabad.       From Ahmedabad, they went to Gandhidham and

there they stated together like husband and wife for about

15 days.

     Counsel for the appellant also submits that there is no

likelihood of the appeal being heard at an early date, thus, prayed

to suspend the sentence.

     Learned PP is unable to refute the aforesaid submissions.

     On conjoint consideration of the submissions made as well as

taking into account the fact that the appellant has undergone

custody of about six years, this Court is inclined to suspend the

sentence.

     Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentences is

allowed and it is directed that the sentences awarded to appellant/

s - Suresh S/o Sh. Gopal Lal by the learned Special Juge,

(POCSO Act & Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act) No.1

Bhilwara vide judgment dated               23.10.2019 in Sessions Case

No.142/18(102/17) shall remain suspended till final disposal of

aforesaid appeal provided he executes a personal bond for a sum

of Rs.50,000/- alongwith two solvent sureties in the sum of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his

appearance before this Court on 15.12.2022 and whenever called

upon to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions

inidcated below:-

      (1)   That he/she/they will appear before the trial court in
      the month of January of every year till the appeal is
      decided.


                    (Downloaded on 10/11/2022 at 08:48:31 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                [SOSA-574/2020]


                                          (2)      That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence,
                                          he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed
                                          address to the trial court as well as to the counsel in the
                                          High Court.
                                          (3)      Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they
                                          will give in writing their changed address(s) to the trial
                                          court.
                                         The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

                                   order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

                                   Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

                                   relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

                                   case the said accused-applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

                                   court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

                                   Court for cancellation of bail.


                                                                   (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

176-Sanjay/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter