Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mayank vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 7982 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7982 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mayank vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 May, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Judge)
                                        (1 of 3)                   [SOSA-348/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                              No. 348/2022

Mayank S/o Ashish, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Rohanwada,
Dungarpur Sadar Police Station, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur.
(Confined In Children Home, Rajsamand)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.      Kum Sarika D/o Dinesh Ahari, B/c Meena R/o Rohanwada
        Khas Dungarur Sadar Ps Dungarpur Dist. Dungarpur
                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. JVS Deora
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

26/05/2022

     Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

     Learned counsel for the appellant has taken this Court

towards the depositions of PW-1, the grandmother, who has

turned hostile; PW-2, the prosecutrix, who has turned hostile; PW-

3, the father, who has turned hostile; PW-4, the brother, who has

turned hostile and PW-5, the uncle, who has turned hostile.

Learned counsel further submits that the appellant himself was of

17 years of age at the time of alleged incident and was tried by

the Children's Court. Learned counsel also submits that the final

hearing of the appeal is likely to take some time.




                    (Downloaded on 26/05/2022 at 08:48:13 PM)
                                         (2 of 3)                   [SOSA-348/2022]



     Learned   Public    Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension   of

sentence application.

     This Court, upon considering the submissions made by

learned counsel for the appellant as well as the fact that there are

no injuries on the internal or external parts of the body of the

prosecutrix, is inclined to suspend the substantive sentence

awarded to the accused-appellant..

     Accordingly, this Suspension of Sentence Application is

allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence passed by

the trial court vide judgment dated 21.02.2022 in Sessions Case

No.28/2020 against applicant-appellant Mayank S/o Ashish shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal,

provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 05.07.2022

and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on

the conditions indicated below:-
     1.    That he/they will appear before the trial Court in
           the month of January of every year till the appeal
           is decided.

     2.    That if the appellant/appellants changes the place
           of residence, he/they/she will give in writing
           her/his/their changed address to the trial Court as
           well as to the counsel in the High Court.

     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

                    (Downloaded on 26/05/2022 at 08:48:13 PM)
                                                                             (3 of 3)                [SOSA-348/2022]



                                   accused-appellant(s) was tried and convicted. A copy of this order

                                   shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

                                   file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

                                   to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

                                   said accused-appellant(s) does not appear before the trial court,

                                   the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court

                                   for cancellation of bail.



                                                                 (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

143-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter