Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6831 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16438/2021
Kalinda W/o Chandrakant, Aged About 44 Years, 6Th Floor, Rupa Soltayar Mileniyam Business Park, Plot No. A-1, Mahape, Mumbai.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Daulat Ram
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. K. Bhati, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Judgment / Order
07/05/2022
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.311/2021, Police Station Sangwara, District Dungarpur, for the
offences under Sections 420, 406 & 120B IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. Pursuant to
the direction issued by this Court on 08.12.2021. the petitioner
had joined the investigation which is reflecting from the factual
report submitted by the learned counsel for the State. The
petitioner is a lady, it appears that there was a dispute between
the parties in respect of liquidation of certain amount. It is not a
case where custodial interrogation of the petitioner would be
indispensable.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16438/2021]
In view of above submissions and after considering facts and
circumstances as available on record. This Court is of the opinion
that it is a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner
under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of petitioner Kalinda W/o Chandrakant
in connection with F.I.R. No.311/2021, Police Station Sangwara,
District Dungarpur, the petitioner shall be released on bail;
provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of
the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following
conditions :-
(i). that the petitioner(s) shall make himself/herself/themselves
available for interrogation by a police officer as and when
required;
(ii). that the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioner(s) shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.
(FARJAND ALI),J 125-nidhi/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!